Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
So a fraction of the female population, using a medium for advertisement that only a fraction will even see, exposing a huge audience that has no interest.
Yup still seems like a very apt comparison.
Especially when that "niche demographic" spans over tens of millions of people.
By that same logic, every single video game that ever existed is "niche."
lulz cow =/= cow
Men can be just as much of a lulz cow as women can be. Its a gender neutral term.
Tens of millions is a big number untill you cumpare it against 300 million. Then 10 million isn't a lot.
Nice is defined by the percentage of the total market. COnsidering the popularity of things like VN's in Asian markets, particularly Japan and China.. there might be more of a market for those globally than say FPS's
Now trying to insult a male by applying female gener teerms. That is misogynistic.
The core argument still boils down to something like this.
"Its not bad because its not against the rules, therefore it needs to not have rules to prevent it from being bad."
Again, has nothing to do with a gender, and a rational person can easily discern that.
And who started the deviation I wonder? We actually were managing a decent discussion before you and Blackspawn chimed in... as usual
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=664824115
If bad is defined as 'being against the rules' then yes. The truthe of the statement is mathematically self-evident.
1+1=2 because 2-1=1 therefore 1+1=2
Do you understand the irony of posting this argument nearly continuously?
But yes, quite fitting. XD