Instalează Steam
conectare
|
limbă
简体中文 (chineză simplificată)
繁體中文 (chineză tradițională)
日本語 (japoneză)
한국어 (coreeană)
ไทย (thailandeză)
български (bulgară)
Čeština (cehă)
Dansk (daneză)
Deutsch (germană)
English (engleză)
Español - España (spaniolă - Spania)
Español - Latinoamérica (spaniolă - America Latină)
Ελληνικά (greacă)
Français (franceză)
Italiano (italiană)
Bahasa Indonesia (indoneziană)
Magyar (maghiară)
Nederlands (neerlandeză)
Norsk (norvegiană)
Polski (poloneză)
Português (portugheză - Portugalia)
Português - Brasil (portugheză - Brazilia)
Русский (rusă)
Suomi (finlandeză)
Svenska (suedeză)
Türkçe (turcă)
Tiếng Việt (vietnameză)
Українська (ucraineană)
Raportează o problemă de traducere
Some key sites are immoral because they sometimes give keys that are resold and may be revoked. People get burned by sites blocked by Steam. Also publishers don't get competition for keys sold on those sites.
Many people assume they are stolen but most of them are actually either bought in bulk for resell or bought in other countries at a cheaper price.
"new historical low price" for this free SDK
ITAD pulls prices from stores using their own software; I don't know how much work they are spending on keeping this working, but there are situations they don't handle well. Getting a "price" for something that's free is the least of the problems.
As more interesting case, for example, was when I found TWO different prices for the same store on the site, both for Steam keys. Turns out, while ITAD listed them both as "Steam", it was actually Epic and Steam keys sold at slight different prices, but ITAD didn't notice the Epic.
Another annoying situation is that sometimes, ITAD doesn't match the game titles correctly. This most often seems to occur with games that might include Japanese stuff on some sites, and not on others. I've also seen the old and new "Thief" being mashed together because they have the same title, but they are actually very different games.
Last but not least, if a game is given away for free, that shows up as the new historical low. While it's technically correct, it's also a completely useless display as it gives you no indication whether a current sale is "good" or not (arguably, the same applies to historical lows that haven't been repeated in years. ITAD might need to think about such cases and how they want to make the data more useful...):