Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
However they originally planned on enforcing the agreements, let alone the ultimate legality of said agreements, isn't so clear to me. However, advances in DRM through the years, with their internet integration (and insufficient regard for EULA-abiding users, IMO), has given the software developers/publishers far greater enforcement capabilities.
There is also a lack of an "absolute standard" as far as I can tell. You got open source on one end, many variations in between where you are permitted to do varying degrees of modding, and a solid "No" on that end that dumped all the data for the DLCs and MTX into the base software's installation and/or are trying to run online servers without hackers, etc. ruining the fairness of the game.
as if we don't have enough shovelware in the store atm.
system should be linear to bring more profits for more sales. it is now, right?
had but not anymore. I purchased audio albums from iTunes (in fact it's now one of the few platforms where you still can purchase audio files for PC and offline usage after google's music kicked the bucket). guess what, I can move, copy, use these audio files as I want so it is already an improvement over old times.
No, games that make tens of millions of dollars get a larger cut of the revenue.
https://steamcommunity.com/groups/steamworks/announcements/detail/1697191267930157838
I don't have any idea how this compares to the previous agreement? Are they getting less greedy?
I am sure they are thinking about the next top game that is getting released in a week.
Are they getting the 75% or the 25%?
The developers getting the larger cut of 75%. while 25% goes to Valve
If the CMOS battery in a PS3, PS4 or PS5 goes dead, the internal DRM clock resets to -1 and all digital licenses will fail DRM checks until the DRM clock has resynced. Said resync happens via receiving a new seed value via encrypted network response from a logged in session on PSN.
In other words: as soon as Sony pulls support to sign in to PSN on those consoles, then you can replace their dead CMOS batteries with as much still living samples as you want - it will get you nothing.
I'm joking by the way.
Right researching that, that's way overblown, and i think PS4 may fixed that anyway. What about 360? Same thing there?
If it doesn't have one, it would reset the clock when you shut down the console or it loses power from the socket.
Is 360 considered a modern console that has such a function? Anyhow, don't matter, there's a much more of a chance your HD goes then that ever happening. But it would seem to me, if it does happen, it means it's "broke" lol.
It doesn't matter if you HDD breaks. If the CMOS batter is dead, you cannot play anything that isn't on a CD. Nothing. Zilch.
All digital purchases/content are lost until it can connect to the servers(if they are active) with a new CMOS battery.
Right, and so the console would be, broken. And what brought this on, is we've already established if something breaks, whether it's your 100 dollar console, or 1000 dollar graphic card, or your HD, or whatever, things break.
Other than that, knowing that things break, if you want to own your games, you have to go to console.