安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Didn't those email disclosures of Mr Spencers wishes and "daydreams" come out during the time of those hearings?
xbox is basically committing soduku to their brand by allowing steam onto the xbox. I literally left xbox because they didnt have good exclusives.
The FTC hearing was over the purchase of Activision-Blizzard. Part of the hearing was investigating internal communications. Guess what emails count as?
Internal communications.
Well, are anyone really coming out with great exclusives lately? We're just in a huge lull in gaming right now imo.
But wouldn't it be great, to go to the Steam App on a 300 dollar Xbox, and get access to your whole library? That would be a selling point i would think.
Meaning, Steam, Epic, others, without having to make any deals, with anyone. That would be a selling point as well i would think.
Glad to see you admit your were wrong about the assumption that Microsoft was brought to the FTC over a passive comment in an email though.
In fact they explicitly said they did not see a way to do it, and that they would play the long game and IF an oppurtunity ever arose in the future to aquire Nintendo they might take it. So clearly they saw no oppurtunity to do so.
It's funny how people forget the letter was focused on Nintendo, not steam and that Valve was mentioned in passing as being something they wished they could do and would possibly pursue if they ever had an oppurtunity.
I mean heck, i'd buy both Microsoft and Valve if the opportunity presents itself. That doesn't remotely imply that its possible....
Microsoft over the years has talked about buying basically everyone like EA, blizzard, etc. You'd be hard pressed to name a major company that hasn't come up at least once with them wanting to buy and not being able to.
It's a good thing then that this isn't a Monarchy and Steam's life isn't tied to that of Mr Newell who is not heavily involved in the day to day operations of Steam and doesn't even live in the same country where Steam is headquartered and its workers live.
Except it never ended up with the FTC as they never moved on Nintendo or Valve as they had no way to buy them. It remained nothing but a day dream, something they have REPEATEDLY done with other companies.
https://www.gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/2018/01/29/rumor-microsoft-looking-at-electronic-arts-as-possible-acquisition-target.aspx
So was this apparently...
https://www.ebay.com/itm/176204789829
And idk where i said, anything, about MS being brought to the FTC over a passive comment. I claimed the email was retrieved, during the FTC, CMA hearings.
Yes, that was a PC. Just pre-built in a console form factor. After all, the first run just had Windows on it until they could finish SteamOS. Which was just Linux and still allowed all the same functionality that Linux does.
I mean emails about the toilets backing up in the bathrooms were also "retrieved" during the FTC hearings. Thats what happens when you get a chunk of internal memo's, you get a ton of stuff that is not relevant to anything the FTC is looking into and thus trying to imply the FTC was involved in what the email was being discussed is disingenuous at best.
Also yes, that is what is commonly known as a PC aka a personal computer. Although its severely limited and inferior to other similar PC's.
No, i wasn't implying that, in fact i said this...
That doesn't at all mean the "cause" or part of the hearings, but at the time of the hearings.
As far as the "PC" console i provided, MS can do the same i would think. Can they not?
It would literally just be a PC.
In fact, you could build a PC like that for cheaper than what any prebuilt would be sold for. You can also upgrade and change out parts without having to buy a whole new one.
Also, you would have to update your OS to keep using Steam like you do now as well.
Anyone can, its just a PC, although they'd be stupid to do the same thing as that. Then again, microsoft has a history of dumb moves so they might very well be stupid enough to do the same thing.
Well to be more accurate what you linked is more akin to a laptop then a PC with how its designed with the hardware it uses.
Well they didn't get leaked, away from the hearings. They got leaked "during" the hearings, which is to say, someone thought it was important enough to speak of Mr Spencers intentions of acquiring others, whilst trying to acquire A/B .
That's likely why there was a rigamarole about it. Not in a conversation at a bar, but in official emails.
As to the much more important matter, being the machine we're talking about, i hear all the time how cheap it is to build PCs.
But we generally use console, being we don't want the headaches of PCs and building them.
And for 400 bucks over there, we can get a pretty decent machine, for the price of a console, Win 11 ready, albeit refurbished.
The overall point i'm making, is that it is possible for MS to come out such such a machine, and even better with partnership of Nvidia, and Mr Newell.
Considering what has been shown here, knowledge on what it takes to build a PC is severely lacking.
The 'point' you're making is literally what a PC already is.