Cài đặt Steam
Đăng nhập
|
Ngôn ngữ
简体中文 (Hán giản thể)
繁體中文 (Hán phồn thể)
日本語 (Nhật)
한국어 (Hàn Quốc)
ไทย (Thái)
Български (Bungari)
Čeština (CH Séc)
Dansk (Đan Mạch)
Deutsch (Đức)
English (Anh)
Español - España (Tây Ban Nha - TBN)
Español - Latinoamérica (Tây Ban Nha cho Mỹ Latin)
Ελληνικά (Hy Lạp)
Français (Pháp)
Italiano (Ý)
Bahasa Indonesia (tiếng Indonesia)
Magyar (Hungary)
Nederlands (Hà Lan)
Norsk (Na Uy)
Polski (Ba Lan)
Português (Tiếng Bồ Đào Nha - BĐN)
Português - Brasil (Bồ Đào Nha - Brazil)
Română (Rumani)
Русский (Nga)
Suomi (Phần Lan)
Svenska (Thụy Điển)
Türkçe (Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ)
Українська (Ukraine)
Báo cáo lỗi dịch thuật
Or people expect every existing video game to cater to them specifically. And if it doesn't, they don't feel "represented" for one reason or another. And another battle in the culture war breaks out.
Have you played Overlord 2?
Yes, I agree. But publishers seem to not understand this. These day they keep saying that not every game is made for you. Yet they still expect you to buy it. And also you're a bad person if they don't meet their sales expectations.
So this is about the character design in a fighting game that came out in 2003. Do you make any points that relate to anything more recent? Over sexualization isn't the gender representation issue that comes to mind today.
The chase for the mythical 'wider audience'.
Really this has been happening in film, and games, and literature.
You don't win new people in by toning down what made it popular with the core audience you win more by simply exposining more people to it or maybe giving them an easy entry point.
FF2/4 did the same thing. It eased down the diffuiculty but it still priovided a fair entry point for new comers to JRPGS. Advanced Wars and Fire Emblem did the same for TTRPGs.
In all the successful cases you find that the developer trusts in the appeal of their core.
Modern execs however got the idea that if you just change the original to be more like something that the new demographic you're trtying to reach likes, you'll get the new demographics...
WHich NEVER WORKS. And opnly ever loses you the old fans and doesn't bring in enough new fans to replace them.
This is what happens when the pe9ople at the top making the decisions are disconnected from both the audience they are trying to appeal to AND the creation process.
Then they realize that untapped market was tiny and a far greater number of people left than they attracted making them go surprised pikachu over it. "But... you weren't suppose to leave. You were suppose to buy the game to demonstrate how tolerant you are."
Yeah well.. I'm with Carol Danvers on this: https://youtu.be/0KK1Kv0IzUg?t=83
If that audience is not the developer of the game, the game will be bad.
"I used to be the audience, but then they changed what the audience was. Now what I’m with isn’t the audience anymore and the audience now seems weird and scary... It’ll happen to you!"
Pretty much. But the other kicker is that games for most, if not all audiences are still being MADE. People are just lazy to find them. With a growing wishlist and backlog despite gaming since 1997, I really can't understand the mentality of people still stuck in the past they're glorifying.