Relic banning for comparing speeds of ww2 vehicles.

[CEO Hunter]

So funny, Relic is going to be out of business. Butthurt clowns deleted every single post went full hitler because I made critical comments about the game.

Like I complained about a Stuart tank being as fast as Schwerer Panzerspähwagen

[CEO Hunter]

Relic moderators I hope you're sending out your resumes to employers right now

[cSg|mc-Hotsauce]

Publicado originalmente por Caravanseray:

Relic banning for comparing speeds of ww2 vehicles.

So funny, Relic is going to be out of business. Butthurt clowns deleted every single post went full hitler because I made critical comments about the game.

Like I complained about a Stuart tank being as fast as Schwerer Panzerspähwagen

It also doesn't help using an account that is 4 days old to post that way in their game hub.

[CEO Hunter]

Company of heroes is now just a cartoon game run by brittle people who cannot accept objective comments

and since those clowns deleted everything I posted, how can you assess how what I said did or did not help?

[CEO Hunter]

The story of this is, Relic implemented a patch tnat punitively punishes players for leaving games with a cool down to start the next match. The WHOLE FORUM is up in arms about it.

So they've gone on a censorship rampage because the cannot handle feedback

[HikariLight]

Well, did you leave polite criticism?
Because if you didn't, well they have every right to ban you for being an ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.

Free Speech does not exist in the private sector.
You are not free from the consequences of your actions/words.

[Soren]

Not sure why you'd post here except that you got banned on the actual sub-forum you are supposed to be posting to be on topic.

Publicado originalmente por Caravanseray:

Relic implemented a patch that punitively punishes players for leaving games with a cool down to start the next match. The WHOLE FORUM is up in arms about it.

Frankly, punishing leavers sounds like a good thing depending on the FPS and if the servers are stable. This sounds like an objectively good decision mostly having backlash because people are used to bad practices.

Reminds me of Core Keeper where the devs accidentally left a dev tool in the game that completely broke progression. People were angry they nerfed the dev tool. Angry that a dev tool didn't exist in a single player game. They eventually got over it though and the game was better for the change.

Another example, Minecraft players will defend super P2W servers because they've lived that way for as long as they can remember. The EULA was eventually changed so you couldn't do stuff like a P2W join server queue (the EULA disallowed out of game P2W elements) and some people got upset about that... and like my other example. People eventually got over it and Minecraft was better for the decision. I for one don't care if those people would be shoved off any forums they used if those were the types of decisions they trying to brigade about.

[CEO Hunter]

Publicado originalmente por Soren:

Not sure why you'd post here except that you got banned on the actual sub-forum you are supposed to be posting to be on topic.

Publicado originalmente por Caravanseray:

Relic implemented a patch that punitively punishes players for leaving games with a cool down to start the next match. The WHOLE FORUM is up in arms about it.

Frankly, punishing leavers sounds like a good thing depending on the FPS and if the servers are stable. This sounds like an objectively good decision mostly having backlash because people are used to bad practices.

Reminds me of Core Keeper where the devs accidentally left a dev tool in the game that completely broke progression. People were angry they nerfed the dev tool. Angry that a dev tool didn't exist in a single player game. They eventually got over it though and the game was better for the change.

Another example, Minecraft players will defend super P2W servers because they've lived that way for as long as they can remember. The EULA was eventually changed so you couldn't do stuff like a P2W join server queue (the EULA disallowed out of game P2W elements) and some people got upset about that... and like my other example. People eventually got over it and Minecraft was better for the decision. I for one don't care if those people would be shoved off any forums they used if those were the types of decisions they trying to brigade about.

If you're in a team game and someone else leaves, you cop the cooldown. For them leaving. Brilliant.

[cSg|mc-Hotsauce]

Publicado originalmente por Caravanseray:

Company of heroes is now just a cartoon game run by brittle people who cannot accept objective comments

and since those clowns deleted everything I posted, how can you assess how what I said did or did not help?

CoH3 you say.

Why does this sound familiar in this forum?

[CEO Hunter]

The relic moderator has removed at least 6 posts about the player punishment

[cSg|mc-Hotsauce]

Nvm... The main account that usually complains about the CoH3 mods is banned on the forums here as well.

[Mad Scientist]

They tend to remove people from their hub that don't appear to own the game which are creating arguments in their hub.

Publicado originalmente por cSg|mc-Hotsauce:

Nvm... The main account that usually complains about the CoH3 mods is banned on the forums here as well.

The usual individual I presume?

[Soren]

Publicado originalmente por Caravanseray:

If you're in a team game and someone else leaves, you cop the cooldown. For them leaving. Brilliant.

Not quite sure I understand what you mean. You cop the cooldown? As in you're banned from matchmaking for a certain time if someone else leaves?

And is that someone else in your party/group? Because parties should be held responsible for what individuals do in them sometimes. If you party up with an aimbotter for example, that should be a ban.

[cSg|mc-Hotsauce]

Publicado originalmente por Mad Scientist:

They tend to remove people from their hub that don't appear to own the game which are creating arguments in their hub.

Publicado originalmente por cSg|mc-Hotsauce:

Nvm... The main account that usually complains about the CoH3 mods is banned on the forums here as well.

The usual individual I presume?

Yup.

Account created on the same day as the other was banned here.

[CEO Hunter]

Publicado originalmente por Mad Scientist:

They tend to remove people from their hub that don't appear to own the game which are creating arguments in their hub.

The people who create the arguments in that forum are those who are childish and throw abuse at a thread premise they don't agree with

[Mad Scientist]

Publicado originalmente por Caravanseray:

Publicado originalmente por Mad Scientist:

They tend to remove people from their hub that don't appear to own the game which are creating arguments in their hub.

The people who create the arguments in that forum are those who are childish and throw abuse at a thread premise they don't agree with

I saw some of the stuff that was removed.

Also they tend to ban people that are ban evading. You risk getting your main account a game ban if you continue this especially after this amount of time.