Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin
If you're referring to me, i think the Win 7 matter, is a perfect example in how 'nothing" is certain in this business. We were told Jan 1, then it was March, not its May or June, or maybe never.
We just do not know, as we do not know, what will happen here.
I am a huge fan of this new FTC Commissioner. But she has failed on the A/B matter, and the CMA had to backpedal, being MS is just too big, run most all the systems in the world, and Valve is small potatoes, not publically traded, not many employees, and a rather easy acquisition.
I'll leave it there, being this has been talked out, and as of today, nothing has come about to change the matter at all.
You were told Valve would drop SUPPORT for Windows 7 on Jan 1st and that is correct as they do not include any updates for Windows 7, because Microsoft killed support for Windows 7.
Steam will fail at some point in time because that is exactly what happened with other Windows versions and i am someone who has being here 19+ years and seen it happen.
Well, it seems most of the "experts" here ended up wrong on Win7, and likely wrong here, and so we're wasting time.
It's very important not to get stuck in these nonsensical traps, of the blind leading the blind, on matters we cannot possible know. The answer to the OP, is we just don't know.
Pure and simple.
And it would def help on these forums, for folks to just admit, "we don't know", rather than excuses, word salad, and predictions that many times end up, wrong.
Where do people come up with this stuff.......
In November 2004, Half-Life 2 was the first game to be offered digitally on Steam, and to require installation of the Steam client for retail copies. During this time users faced problems attempting to play the game.[7][12][13] The Steam requirement was met with concerns about software ownership, software requirements, and problems with overloaded servers demonstrated previously by the Counter-Strike rollout.[14]
In 2005, third-party developers were contracted to release games on Steam, such as Rag Doll Kung Fu and Darwinia.[15][16] In May 2007, ATI included Steam in the ATI Catalyst GPU driver as well as offering a free Steam copy of Half-Life 2: Lost Coast and Half-Life 2: Deathmatch to ATI Radeon owners.[17] In January 2008, Nvidia promoted Steam in the GeForce GPU driver, as well as offering a free Steam copy of Portal: The First Slice to Nvidia hardware owners.[18]
In 2011, Electronic Arts removed some of its games from Steam because of its restrictive terms of service, and launched its games—beginning with Mass Effect 3 in 2012—on its Origin service.[19][20][21] In 2019, Ubisoft announced that they would stop selling their future games on Steam starting with Tom Clancy's The Division 2 because Valve would not modify its revenue sharing model.[22] In May 2019, Microsoft distributed its games on Steam in addition to the Microsoft Store.[23]
No word from MSFT itself but, this rumor started in the rumor mills of Reddit and Youtube.
Since then speculation and rumors is all that is known.
It would be a good move for MSFT, bad move for the rest of us.
Nor does steam care about what you do with your account when you're dead
Nor does "sweet baby Inc" have control over game developers
Nor is unity charging developers for every distribution they've ever made
Nor did Linus tech tips run a brothel/sweat shop/sex dungeon
Nor is gamer-gate in control of all videogame media.
People reading this who aren't attention trolling, please use your brain and let these threads perish, trolls don't need your assistance in making "gamers" look gullible.
This is also ignoring the entire idea that Congress would even allow it which in complete clear regulations: the buyout would have to be brought to every-single-nation that Valve operates in, just like how Microsoft had to do the same with Blizzard and how the last 2 nations to finally allow the buyout was the United States and the United Kingdom.
Even if it was all true, Microsoft currently would not be able to buy Valve, they just bought out Blizzard and given how tiny Blizzard is to the other giants that remain, the chances of Congress even allowing it are very, very slim, not 0 but its low enough to not humor it.
We could've had "steam-blizzard" but got stuck with acti-blizz.
I wonder what that would've been like...
Damn, I was hopeful of finally losing my virginity...
Ohh wow, We could have a Paradox Steam Interactive.
That would be cool though, get all of the developers and build ONE BIG GAME!
They could name it "Star Planet Citizen Universalis Field"
Just sayin'......