Installa Steam
Accedi
|
Lingua
简体中文 (cinese semplificato)
繁體中文 (cinese tradizionale)
日本語 (giapponese)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandese)
Български (bulgaro)
Čeština (ceco)
Dansk (danese)
Deutsch (tedesco)
English (inglese)
Español - España (spagnolo - Spagna)
Español - Latinoamérica (spagnolo dell'America Latina)
Ελληνικά (greco)
Français (francese)
Indonesiano
Magyar (ungherese)
Nederlands (olandese)
Norsk (norvegese)
Polski (polacco)
Português (portoghese - Portogallo)
Português - Brasil (portoghese brasiliano)
Română (rumeno)
Русский (russo)
Suomi (finlandese)
Svenska (svedese)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraino)
Segnala un problema nella traduzione
L'autore della discussione ha indicato un messaggio come risposta alla propria domanda.
Regole e linee guida per le discussioni
Segnala questo messaggio
What is the benefit to the consumer/gamer of blocking contributions to the overall score? Weve already lost trust in our media institutions, and are seeing manipulation on all mainstream review sites, why would Steam follow suit after all these years? This is not a positive for you and me.
I would suggest you contact support and ask them why those specific games are not counted. I can't see your account and don't know any of the details but they could answer your question. If there is a bug that causes some to not get counted when they should be that is a completely separate issue that should be resolved by steam.
The rest of us are only referring to the games that are supposed to not count such as the ones acquired off steam.
As repeatedly mentioned it prevents dev's from being able to give out hundreds of keys in exchange for favorable reviews to manipulate their review scores. Its one of the most basic precautions steam could take and its been this way for nearly a decade so its not new.
If you want to see the score and factor in reviews for keys purchased outside of steam you are also able to, its just not defaulted that way.
Welcome to the echo chamber of Steam employees. Where the larger issue is always drowned out by microscopic details. We here you.
Although I am moving away from the PC gaming industry I still following the movements of Steam. Again though, I want to point out that Steam is not to be pointed out specifically. The lack of the tech industry from any form of regulation is. When the tides tip to the other side Steam will be in the crosshairs like every other technology company.
So you are saying you don't want Steam to have any safeguards to prevent developers from being able to have fraudulent reviews... That is an interesting stance to have and very anti consumer.
Funny enough steam is self regulating and providing safeguards, but you seem to take offense at their regulations because you don't like them.
Seriously, if you cared this much about it counting to the overall score you should've bought it on Steam. Else, you should be buying games to enjoy them where reviewing it isn't the priority. Though customers opinions are generally considered more important than users which makes sense to restrict what counts to prevent the old free key for good reviews stuff some Devs did.
Keep in mind it's the same for community features initially; accounts are not equal if they don't unlimit their account, non spending customers have overall limitations & can't welcome themselves anywhere on Steam with strong posting limitations. Those that unlimit by spending on Steam have more abilities. Also just like how users in good standing are treated differently compared to individuals with a massive moderation history.
Valves actions for a long time says that they prefer customers have more compared to people just trying to use the platform. So yet-again, if you only care about the review affecting the score, buy it on Steam.
Though a review implies the game is actually being reviewed when being submitted. So if the review clearly isn't a review of the game then it already doesn't matter what they write.
OKay now that soundlike a genuine case of oversight.. the free weekend one. YOu mayy want to send a ticket to support about that. COuld be there's a kink in the selct cases or flag priorities .
Fraud Preventions. The problem with Fraud Prevention and any ckinda of preventative system is you';re gonna get false positives.
A slippery slope is not always a fallacy, but I understand your confusion because there are a lot of people online who go around using words they don't fully understand and they think it always is.
That is true, i've seen people claim things are arbitrary for instance without having a proper grasp on what the word means.
Given how normal this is on many e-commerce places, I doubt you have an issue with the other places doing this, let alone steam. As usual, if you want it to count, buy it on the store you want it to matter on, though if one leaves a review it should actually review the game for an opinion on a game to be taken even remotely seriously.
I love how everyone thinks they are a philosopher.
In case anyone was curious it hasn't changed in nearly 7 years
It also shows that Valve has no wish to force hubs to be restricted to only game owners. Since devs literally currently have that option, there's no reason to.
I payed for my copy of Helldivers 2. And all the many, many games I've acquired from Humble Bundle.
This is very common when you do this at other places when buying from 3rd parties as the main store often receives less to no money and they cannot and should not be required to spend their funds on people who are not their customers directly.
What matters is, that you have played the game to evaluate it. What a joke. Do better valve..