Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
Valve is suing Zaiger, which is a law firm that hired Bucher. Bucher pitched them on extorting Valve by trying to force them to settle rather than paying the filing fees to defend against thousand of arbitrations. Zaiger then fired Bucher, who started his own Valve-extortion scheme independently. He also sued Zaiger, and a slide deck he included as an exhibit in that case was included in Valve's suit against Zaiger.
From what i'm reading it was Zaiger who pitched the idea, not Bucher who worked with them on it. They pitched it to an investment group who gave them seed money to fund this which makes it a clear cut violation of numerous laws
The slides are really worth a watch, BTW:
https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/xmvjlawjrvr/frankel-valvevzaiger--massarbpowerpoint.pdf
Wow, its a literal modern day ambulance chaser
AAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHA!!!
Proof:
https://steamcommunity.com/discussions/forum/1/3833171151469212438/#c3833171151469248502
Heck, maybe that'll end up in an ironic way, a payout so big that they make some sort of Proton Gaming Laptop, "Steam Deck XL" lol
Not only will they lose tons of money, they can also be jailed and/or disbarred aka loosing the right to act as a lawyer.
Yeah I definitely think most/all of them were just people trying to get free money they don't deserve.
Also the idea Steam is a "monopoly" that needs the attention of anti-trust laws is ridiculous considering there are so many other more deserving cases of companies monopolizing things. YouTube is a genuine monopoly, for example. Sure there's some other smaller video websites but they have tiny user populations relative to YouTube. And Google didn't even do anything to earn that user population... they just threw their corporate money around and bought up YouTube. A lot of people would go as far as to say they actually made YouTube worse, but where will discontented YouTubers go? All the creators they want are on YouTube. And creators are unwilling to leave YouTube because there aren't many viewers on alternative platforms... a self-reinforcing monopoly.
The greatest irony of the whole situation is that Steam is arguably disrupting existing monopolies on the market by dramatically increasing the amount of software support for smaller operating systems like Linux as they fight against the bloated Microsoft Windows monopoly. I mean the only serious OS choice you had for PC gaming was Windows up until Steam created Proton for Linux. And Windows seems like it's arguably more of a monopoly than Steam is, especially in the area of PC gaming.
The company actually bringing much-needed options and competition to the PC operating system market (Valve) and disrupting monopolies ends up getting accused of being a monopoly...it's crazy!
Not to mention how Steam is fighting the Meta monopoly on non-console VR gaming.
Just because 1 law firm did it the wrong way doesn't mean there is not legitimate reason to prosecute, If anything this whole thread is being recorded by 3rd parties, In a attempt to gather more information into the misdeeds and unprofessional nature of steam and its forums.
When it comes down to ethical breaks and data collection government agencies get involved, nobody is out for a piece of what steam doesn't have, which is real profit.
it has been discussed that the tech industry across the board is broke, this includes video games, which as can be seen steam is often times relying on small unknown zero overhead developer companies to supply then with quick flash cash sales.
such as steams top 10 game "Lethal Company" which was a unknown developer, who released countless poor quality an failed software on steam, which steam mysteriously removed after the success of one suspected fraud marketing advertisement put the game in the top 1 sales spot on steam.
what really needs to happen is a deep dive investigation.
into
steams forums
steams marketing
steams trade market
steams scamming of trade market values
steams theft of relevant user data
steams denial of service and framing of innocent users so steam can protect its scams and fraud.
all of these things need investigated by the governments of each nation. While steam sells games to play international.
steam also engages with international trading and gambling as its currency known as "steam wallet" can be misused to provide and even fund criminal activity by the means to pay individual parties for acts that are counter to the safety of all nations.
while everyone hopes this doesn't happen, the breach of ethical services across international lines puts steam in a serious and dangerous situation which can effect the security of information and data collection across all said nations that allow connection to steam.
FYI steam is capturing data from every user it has in the world, it is not just a usa issue or europe issue it is a world issue, as steam has data on china, turkey, russia, and even saudi and israel users.
the thoughts what laws this breaks and what could be done with this information if it fell into the wrong hands, is catastrophic to all Nations security
[Yawns] Yeah sure.