Capitalism Fest!?!

[scambammer]

YES! I love capitalism!!! It bought me everything I have

[Intelligent Jew Businessman]

Messaggio originale di Yuri:

there's no way out of capitalism :D

Sonic the Hedgehog is a capitalist.

[D. Flame]

Messaggio originale di Dr. Jester:

Messaggio originale di D. Flame:

Because you can buy your way to the front of the line in the USA. It's not poor folks going to the USA for treatment. Hell, Americans are flying to Mexico to get treated.

Because they have the best treatment, and treatment to things that are not available on socialized medicine countries.

Stop lying.

https://nypost.com/2023/03/08/1-2m-americans-visit-mexico-for-medical-tourism-each-year/

[Intelligent Jew Businessman]

Messaggio originale di D. Flame:

Messaggio originale di Dr. Jester:

Because they have the best treatment, and treatment to things that are not available on socialized medicine countries.

Stop lying.

https://nypost.com/2023/03/08/1-2m-americans-visit-mexico-for-medical-tourism-each-year/

So .3 percent of the US population goes to mexico for treatment. I'd i think its safe to say the majority of those are for frivolous cosmetic type surgery. Lol. Not a good point but whatever. keep trying

[D. Flame]

Messaggio originale di Intelligent Jew Businessman:

Messaggio originale di D. Flame:

https://nypost.com/2023/03/08/1-2m-americans-visit-mexico-for-medical-tourism-each-year/

So .3 percent of the US population goes to mexico for treatment. I'd i think its safe to say the majority of those are for frivolous cosmetic type surgery. Lol. Not a good point but whatever. keep trying

No True Scottsman fallacy

[Low Standards]

Does anyone know what the thread is about? It seems meaningless.

[DarkCrystalMethod]

Messaggio originale di Low Standards:

Does anyone know what the thread is about? It seems meaningless.

The thread was about the current sale on steam.
Despite being reminded they keep derailing.
Probably without consequences either.

[Low Standards]

Messaggio originale di DarkCrystalMethod:

Messaggio originale di Low Standards:

Does anyone know what the thread is about? It seems meaningless.

The thread was about the current sale on steam.
Despite being reminded they keep derailing.
Probably without consequences either.

thank you.

[D. Flame]

Messaggio originale di DarkCrystalMethod:

Messaggio originale di Low Standards:

Does anyone know what the thread is about? It seems meaningless.

The thread was about the current sale on steam.
Despite being reminded they keep derailing.
Probably without consequences either.

Actually, the thread is about capitalism, as witnessed by the OP itself. However, backseat moderating, like you are attempting to do...

[Intelligent Jew Businessman]

Messaggio originale di D. Flame:

Messaggio originale di Intelligent Jew Businessman:

So .3 percent of the US population goes to mexico for treatment. I'd i think its safe to say the majority of those are for frivolous cosmetic type surgery. Lol. Not a good point but whatever. keep trying

No True Scottsman fallacy

Where did i falsify anything? I did basic math. 1.2 million of 340 million is .3%. Is it not? Thats really not a lot. You are the one making numbers seem like they are more than what they really are. Simple math can debunk your claims easily.

You just posted an article that essentially says .3% of americans go to mexico for medical treatments like that even on the radar.

Why do more canadians go to USA?

https://www.statista.com/statistics/654694/patients-receiving-treatment-outside-canada/

https://www.usnews.com/news/best-countries/articles/2016-08-03/canadians-increasingly-come-to-us-for-health-care

https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/canada-health-care-access-1.6574184



Lol, at your "fallacies"... This is ez.

[D. Flame]

Messaggio originale di Intelligent Jew Businessman:

Messaggio originale di D. Flame:

No True Scottsman fallacy

Where did i falsify anything?

Lol, at your "fallacies"... This is ez.

You might want to look up what the fallacy entails before trying to gloat.

[Intelligent Jew Businessman]

Messaggio originale di D. Flame:

Messaggio originale di Intelligent Jew Businessman:

Where did i falsify anything?

Lol, at your "fallacies"... This is ez.

You might want to look up what the fallacy entails before trying to gloat.

maybe you should look up words before you use them

No true Scotsman, or appeal to purity, is an informal fallacy in which one attempts to protect their generalized statement from a falsifying counterexample.

So back to my question, where did i falsify my counterexample? i did basic division to debunk your tripe. Thats it.

Im waiting for you to explain how i falsified anything by doing simple division. Or just keep tossing buzz words at the wall and hoping they stick, i guess.

[D. Flame]

Messaggio originale di Intelligent Jew Businessman:

Messaggio originale di D. Flame:

You might want to look up what the fallacy entails before trying to gloat.

maybe you should look up words before you use them

No true Scotsman, or appeal to purity, is an informal fallacy in which one attempts to protect their generalized statement from a falsifying counterexample.

So back to my question, where did i falsify my counterexample? i did basic division to debunk your tripe. Thats it.

Im waiting for you to explain how i falsified anything by doing simple division. Or just keep tossing buzz words at the wall and hoping they stick, i guess.

Even reading it, you still don't understand it, lol.

Here's an easier explanation for you, with an example included for good measure:

https://www.scribbr.com/fallacies/no-true-scotsman-fallacy/

The no true Scotsman fallacy is the attempt to defend a generalization by denying the validity of any counterexamples given. By changing the definition of who or what belongs to a group or category, the speaker can conveniently dismiss any example that proves the generalization doesn’t hold.

No true Scotsman fallacy example
Person 1: No Scotsman puts sugar in his porridge!

Person 2: But my friend Duncan likes sugar with his porridge.

Person 1: Yes, but no true Scotsman puts sugar in his porridge.

[Intelligent Jew Businessman]

Messaggio originale di D. Flame:

Messaggio originale di Intelligent Jew Businessman:

maybe you should look up words before you use them

No true Scotsman, or appeal to purity, is an informal fallacy in which one attempts to protect their generalized statement from a falsifying counterexample.

So back to my question, where did i falsify my counterexample? i did basic division to debunk your tripe. Thats it.

Im waiting for you to explain how i falsified anything by doing simple division. Or just keep tossing buzz words at the wall and hoping they stick, i guess.

Even reading it, you still don't understand it, lol.

Here's an easier explanation for you, with an example included for good measure:

https://www.scribbr.com/fallacies/no-true-scotsman-fallacy/

The no true Scotsman fallacy is the attempt to defend a generalization by denying the validity of any counterexamples given. By changing the definition of who or what belongs to a group or category, the speaker can conveniently dismiss any example that proves the generalization doesn’t hold.

No true Scotsman fallacy example
Person 1: No Scotsman puts sugar in his porridge!

Person 2: But my friend Duncan likes sugar with his porridge.

Person 1: Yes, but no true Scotsman puts sugar in his porridge.

Your example was irrelevant and i used basic math to prove it. 1.2 million people is not a lot. You actually proved my point for me. So your generalization doesnt hold and i proved it with math.

Why do i have to counter your points but you have yet to even attempt to counter any of mine. Because you cant.

Now, im sorry .3% of americans feel the need to go to mexico for medical treatment. But really, thats not a lot of people and really nothing to complain about. If .3 percent of people go to mexico that means 99.7% of people are happy with their healthcare system? no?

Admit your point was dumb. Because it was. It actually helps my points.

[D. Flame]

Messaggio originale di Intelligent Jew Businessman:

Messaggio originale di D. Flame:

Even reading it, you still don't understand it, lol.

Here's an easier explanation for you, with an example included for good measure:

https://www.scribbr.com/fallacies/no-true-scotsman-fallacy/

Your example was irrelevant and i used basic math to prove it. 1.2 million people is not a lot. You actually proved my point for me. So your generalization doesnt hold and i proved it with math.

Why do i have to counter your points but you have yet to even attempt to counter any of mine. Because you cant.

Now, im sorry .3% of americans feel the need to go to mexico for medical treatment. But really, thats not a lot of people and really nothing to complain about. If .3 percent of people go to mexico that means 99.7% of people are happy with their healthcare system? no?

Admit your point was dumb. Because it was. It actually helps my points.

Logical fallacies do not warranty a response.

I pointed out that Americans are going to Mexico for medical services. I was called a liar. I proved it with hard evidence and you tried to pull a "no true scottsman fallacy" by attempting to dismiss it as "cosmetic" and "not that many" effectively trying to redefine the category, since it proved you wrong.

[Intelligent Jew Businessman]

Messaggio originale di D. Flame:

Messaggio originale di Intelligent Jew Businessman:

Your example was irrelevant and i used basic math to prove it. 1.2 million people is not a lot. You actually proved my point for me. So your generalization doesnt hold and i proved it with math.

Why do i have to counter your points but you have yet to even attempt to counter any of mine. Because you cant.

Now, im sorry .3% of americans feel the need to go to mexico for medical treatment. But really, thats not a lot of people and really nothing to complain about. If .3 percent of people go to mexico that means 99.7% of people are happy with their healthcare system? no?

Admit your point was dumb. Because it was. It actually helps my points.

Logical fallacies do not warranty a response.

I pointed out that Americans are going to Mexico for medical services. I was called a liar. I proved it with hard evidence and you tried to pull a "no true scottsman fallacy" by attempting to dismiss it as "cosmetic" and "not that many" effectively trying to redefine the category, since it proved you wrong.

Quote where i called you a liar. I dont disagree that americans go to mexico for treatment. What are you talking about. My point is the number is so low it doesnt matter or its irrelevant. Which it is. Math proves that. If you said a quarter of americans go to mexico for treatment, maybe id agree its there is probably a problem with the american heathcare system. But .3%? come on man, thats a joke.

Just because some americans have been to space doesnt mean most americans enjoy or even want to go to space. That is silly. No?

Because 5% of Canadians go to US for treatment even though they can stay in canada and get treatment for free. Now that is a problem. Not .3%. But you refuse to address my points. Wonder why.