Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
Well, what you write is very clearly support of decision and dismissing the the clients' incenveniences, inabilities or pure preference to just use the systems they are happy with and change for something worse for them. If yu didn;t mean it like that, well, the confusion is created in there. :-/
How about this: if you were the decision maker at valve, would you proceed it this particular way? Or rather go with one of suggested other paths, like keeping the "nioui" client working with just login, install and launch, limiting drop of support to only the full client?
If the latter, then you did poor job of "just acking how things are", while for the former, then its what we call support, for good.
The problem with asking these kinds of hypotheticals is that you fail to take in to account the greed and sociopathy you get at the levels of business where these decisions are typically made.
You will have to upgrade eventually anyway. That's not even a debate, it's a matter of when not if.
Most will upgrade and the rest got only themselves to blame. Or if they cant accept the consequences of their choices because reasons, blame Microsoft because THEY killed 7... not Valve.
If you see all that that as "supporting" Valve, then I can only conclude that the word "supporting" can be added to the long list of words that have lost meaning due to people wrongly using them. And that people apparently indeed are incapable of understanding that other people can look at things from multiple perspectives, not just the one that suits them. A pity, though.
Agreed. Idealistic thoughts are nice, but rarely realistic. In a perfect world things would be different. The world is not perfect, though.
it is not about what OS MS is still supporting.
it is about features which wont work on older systems.
The only reason why valve is dropping support for older systems is mostly because stuff wont work on them, and it would not really possible to have a legacy client out there, as those would be needed to maintained too, and which is more problematic, the server would still need to support it, which would mean that old unsecure stuff needs to run on those as the newer "interface" would not be compatible with the old client.
Providing the os-agnostic thin client is exactly what would cure the root problem for now and for ever. Could have been done at dropping XT. And there was not even debate of the possibility or feasibility. It's not done just because goes against agenda. What is NOT making us play our bought games conveniently.
That’s what I was saying, yes.
And attributing human qualities to businesses is onky a receipt for dissapointment.
How would you keep support when windows 10 becomes vulnerable to the next generation of operating systems?
you ignored that they want to stick with windows 10.