.

[PinkPanzer]

.

[BOT Anna]

Publicado originalmente por HikariLight:

Publicado originalmente por cog:

This reasoning is beyond disgusting...

Do the research.
Loli is a body type, not an age range

its called petite, try doing as you say and research

[Intelligent Jew Businessman]

Publicado originalmente por HikariLight:

Publicado originalmente por cog:

This reasoning is beyond disgusting...

Do the research.
Loli is a body type, not an age range

The way you are justifying and defending it is disgusting. And you are wrong.

"loli" is derived from the word "lolita" Which was a book written by Vladimir Nabokov that addresses hebephilia. Thats the history of the word. DO THE RESEARCH.

[Intelligent Jew Businessman]

Publicado originalmente por Dizzydeath1337:

Publicado originalmente por cog:

Ummm.

Section 2256 of Title 18. Learn it.

"Visual depictions include photographs, videos, digital or computer generated images indistinguishable from an actual minor, and images created, adapted, or modified, but appear to depict an identifiable, actual minor. Undeveloped film, undeveloped videotape, and electronically stored data that can be converted into a visual image of child pornography are also deemed illegal visual depictions under federal law."

"Indistinguishable from an actual minor" "appear to depict an actual minor"
Notice the issue?

No, not really. You do know what the word "And" means, right?

[HikariLight]

Loli:
A young or young-looking girl character in Japanese anime and manga.
While derived from the word Lolita, it does not mean child, it means young or young looking.
And young does not mean child as well, as teenagers are considered young.

[Dizzydeath1337]

Publicado originalmente por cog:

Publicado originalmente por Dizzydeath1337:

"Indistinguishable from an actual minor" "appear to depict an actual minor"
Notice the issue?

No, not really.

That's your problem to solve, then, but it doesn't suddenly make fictional artwork that is clearly distinguishable from an actual minor illegal.

[Intelligent Jew Businessman]

Publicado originalmente por Dizzydeath1337:

Publicado originalmente por cog:

No, not really.

That's your problem to solve, then, but it doesn't suddenly make fictional artwork that is clearly distinguishable from an actual minor illegal.

"AND"

[Intelligent Jew Businessman]

Publicado originalmente por HikariLight:

Loli:
A young or young-looking girl character in Japanese anime and manga.
While derived from the word Lolita, it does not mean child, it means young or young looking.
And young does not mean child as well, as teenagers are considered young.

The guy who invented the word wrote a book about hebephilia and titled his book "Lolita". You can spin it in your head however you want to make yourself feel better but you are actually sick.

[🦊Λℚ𝓤ΛƑΛᗯҜᔕ🦊]

Publicado originalmente por HikariLight:

Far too many associate loli with underage.
That is very incorrect.
Loli characters are youthful in appearance with a petite body.
It does not equal underage.
A legal aged girl can be considered a loli if she has a petite enough body.

Wow. And you are actively defending the discussion of CP in public in the steam forums. I guess that's someone else to add to the reports too. You sickos are really damn disgusting.

[Intelligent Jew Businessman]

Publicado originalmente por 🦊Λℚ𝓤ΛƑΛᗯҜᔕ🦊:

Publicado originalmente por HikariLight:

Far too many associate loli with underage.
That is very incorrect.
Loli characters are youthful in appearance with a petite body.
It does not equal underage.
A legal aged girl can be considered a loli if she has a petite enough body.

Wow. And you are actively defending the discussion of CP in public in the steam forums. I guess that's someone else to add to the reports too. You sickos are really damn disgusting.

A few of these sickos are. I need to gtfo of here before i get banned because this ♥♥♥♥ is actually stomach turning and my emotions are going to take over.

[Dizzydeath1337]

Publicado originalmente por cog:

Publicado originalmente por Dizzydeath1337:

That's your problem to solve, then, but it doesn't suddenly make fictional artwork that is clearly distinguishable from an actual minor illegal.

"AND"

Images created that appear to depict an actual, identifiable minor? Yeah, that's anything that isn't based on a real, existing person.

[Intelligent Jew Businessman]

Publicado originalmente por Dizzydeath1337:

Publicado originalmente por cog:

"AND"

Images created that appear to depict an actual, identifiable minor? Yeah, that's anything that isn't based on a real, existing person.

Visual depictions include photographs, videos, digital or computer generated images indistinguishable from an actual minor, AND AND AND images created, adapted, or modified, but appear to depict an identifiable, actual minor. Please tell me you understand the definitions of the words "and" and "or"

[Dizzydeath1337]

Publicado originalmente por cog:

Publicado originalmente por Dizzydeath1337:

Images created that appear to depict an actual, identifiable minor? Yeah, that's anything that isn't based on a real, existing person.

Visual depictions include photographs, videos, digital or computer generated images indistinguishable from an actual minor, AND AND AND images created, adapted, or modified, but appear to depict an identifiable, actual minor.

Yes, I'm not seeing the issue, they both contain the condition "actual minor," not fictional character.

[Intelligent Jew Businessman]

Publicado originalmente por Dizzydeath1337:

Publicado originalmente por cog:

Visual depictions include photographs, videos, digital or computer generated images indistinguishable from an actual minor, AND AND AND images created, adapted, or modified, but appear to depict an identifiable, actual minor.

Yes, I'm not seeing the issue, they both contain the condition "actual minor," not fictional character.

Ok, do you understand the definition of the word "indistinguishable"? This is painful.

[Dizzydeath1337]

Publicado originalmente por cog:

Publicado originalmente por Dizzydeath1337:

Yes, I'm not seeing the issue, they both contain the condition "actual minor," not fictional character.

Ok, do you understand the definition of the word "indistinguishable"?

Yes, so what of artwork of a character that is distinguishable from an actual minor and not based on a real, living human being? That is legal content.

[AmsterdamHeavy]

Publicado originalmente por 🦊Λℚ𝓤ΛƑΛᗯҜᔕ🦊:

Publicado originalmente por HikariLight:

Far too many associate loli with underage.
That is very incorrect.
Loli characters are youthful in appearance with a petite body.
It does not equal underage.
A legal aged girl can be considered a loli if she has a petite enough body.

Wow. And you are actively defending the discussion of CP in public in the steam forums. I guess that's someone else to add to the reports too. You sickos are really damn disgusting.

The best part is they started taking that line of defense a few years ago because before then it was all about underage.