Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
I dont understand what you just wrote.
anyway, I would like some focus on my question. specifically ubisoft is my question
(Wich is that hard to understand part of my texts above, I don't get it?)
but my question is
which as more of a negative impact on the gaming industry? indies or ubisoft
What I meant to say was those big publishers keep producing their franchise and similar games, spending fair money amounts on marketing and they then include those spendings into sell price. They have subscrivers, season pass buyers and just fanboys to keep their machine going no matter of quality their products AND they need that machine going constantly.
Indie (independent) devs on the other hand may produce crap, but they can't hide that fact behind massive advertisement. Some of them, also could produce amazing or even revolutionary games, based on creative idea, not on bufget.
Whoever's committing the crime.
yeah that is avoiding the question because you know why I am asking it. weight matters and you know it.
I know your position now. You will spend days, weeks maybe even months talking about the injustices served to the industry by a game that costs .99 cents and has 400 reviews and when you get time sometime next year you might spend 10 maybe 20 mins talking about ubisoft.
yeah I get it
False advertising from an indie is no different from false advertising from a major company. Both are crimes given equal weight under the law. As the major company gets beat down by the law for false advertisement, this is only a good thing for gamers. When the big guys get taken down, it shows all the other rats that they can't get away with it either.
I know your position now. You will spend days, weeks maybe even months talking about the injustices served to the industry by a game that costs .99 cents and has 400 reviews and when you get time sometime next year you might spend 10 maybe 20 mins talking about ubisoft.
yeah I get it
but at least we can come to the agreement (I think anyway) that jokes are not offensive and need to be buried form the gaming industry
You don't know a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ thing.
I know a lot more than you think or give me credit for.
anyway...at least we can come to one agreement.
Jokes are ok to have in the gaming industry and that there is no reason to censor a game because it makes fun of killing cats (as an example) and that its ok for me to like games that you dont like AND you dont even have to try and understand why
No. You don't. Go ♥♥♥♥ yourself. I treat the indies the same way I treat the bigs. You think I don't. Go ♥♥♥♥ yourself. You want to argue against something I've not said. You want to argue about something that you've only constructed yourself in your head. Go ♥♥♥♥ yourself.
if you do you would be an extreeme rarity so forgive me if I dont take your word for it. sorry that makes you upset
for example, I would never had the chance to find the game "black desert online" if I had searched for it only on steam.
or mech warrior online or blade and soul or camelot unchained ect ect....
and game like poop simulation cant not be found via google, unless you search for poop simulation
like it will never come up if you are searching for simulation games
however, if I dont know about Factorio which is a great game how would I know to look for it?
that was the pre-2011 problem. I almost gave up gaming completely during those 'cant find anything other than crap AAA games' years