Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
The little stickers that advertise a specific version of the OS didn’t help with these sorts of perceptions, which is likely why the newer ones just say “Windows”…
Windows 10 minimum system requirements:
Processor: 1 gigahertz (GHz) or faster processor or SoC
RAM: 1 gigabyte (GB) for 32-bit or 2 GB for 64-bit
Hard disk space: 16 GB for 32-bit OS or 20 GB for 64-bit OS
Graphics card: DirectX 9 or later with WDDM 1.0 driver
Display: 800 x 600
Intel's CPUs released in 2010, the 2nd Gen Intel Core, had initial clock speeds of 3.8GHz. Basically, you could run Windows 10 on PCs with CPUs from 2000 onward. That's 23 years worth of hardware that Windows 10 is compatible with.
And, yes, while Windows 10 is due to EOS in a couple of years with Windows 11 having strict hardware requirements is a future filled with doom and uncertainty, for now at least you have an option. But as others have said, it's probably more that you don't want to rather than it actually being an impossibility.
10 is gone in 2 years.
You very likely can use your old computer for that
Windows 10 will limp along for years after the official ending of support the same way that 7, XP and 98SE did. You can even do the unsupported install of Windows 11 on a lot of this "Windows 10" hardware, you just have to remember that that's entirely at Microsoft's discretion and could change at any time.
It's a minority of users, one that has been declining even further since the announcement came. By the time Jan 2024 hits, it will be probably 1% or less.
It was the same the previous 3 times Valve dropped support for older Windows versions. When XP/Vista got dropped Jan 2019 the threads were almost identical to now. Back then people too argued that Valve couldn't be dropping X% of users.
Reality is that not every user/customer is worth equal. Heck, some customers aren't even worth keeping, so to say. The ones who want to stay on Win 7/8 are called "acceptable losses" in business.
steam could put that time and effort into tasks that earn more.
it really would distribute too much work force.
Windows users account for 96.94% of all Steam users. Windows 7, 7 (64), and Windows 8.1 combined account for 1.47% of that 96.94%. So let's assume the figure you found is correct. In which case there are 127,960,800 active Steam users on a version of Windows. Of that 1,881,024 users are on one of the versions of Windows that is now obsolete. That number is steadily dropping month on month. By January 2024, that'll be down to less than 1 million.
That also means that there are 126,079,776 active Steam users on a supported version of Windows. The vast majority of them being on Windows 10 (73,088,446 users).
Point being, Valve can happily afford to lose that 1 million odd who refuse to upgrade. They aren't buying anything current anyway.
Financial pressure is just a valid reason than any others, if not one of the most common and legit. Wanting to keep software running on hardware which is still running fine is also completely logical. That hyper consumerism trend is what is stupid.
It is absolutely no secret that the only reason why Steam is dropping support for Windows 7 is because Chromium does it and they can't be arsed to fix it.
Linux gets a pass because A.) Gabe has been questiing to push the industry away from depending on microsoft. B.) It doesn't require much on their part.
You will get to stay up to date for free with a system that according to the people eats a lot less power.
Linux is what you actually want when you argue that win 7 should not be replaced by win 10.
Its ironic how in your post you call it "old". Its just not sold "again".