Installer Steam
Logg inn
|
språk
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (tradisjonell kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tsjekkisk)
Dansk (dansk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spania)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latin-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (gresk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (nederlandsk)
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasil)
Română (rumensk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et problem med oversettelse
This is why wording is important, I said a form of, it means a version of truth, or a distortion of it, You cannot find truth no matter what you do, its always a distorted version. You should be able to tell though, by actually studying alot and becoming an academic. I am a Philosophy PhD candidate, my studies revolve around consciousness and death. This is where they lead me. And where is that you ask? A few simple truths, like death is an illusion, and consciousness survives death. Are the two starting foundational steps to this understanding. The next involve quantum physics, and quantum mechanics. Any person with an ounce of understanding of reality will tell you that other dimensions exist, they are distortions of light unpercivable by us. Some people can perceive it if they are oriented towards that frequency. The most foundational physics understanding tho get this is that all of reality is nothing but vibration and illusion.
This goes back to history, and even religion. How religion is possibly nothing but extraterrestrial and extra dimensional contact. We misconstrued these extra dimensional beings for god. This is a serious form of inquiry and study. Thats why its not for everyone, only those that understand reality, history, mythology, religion, and are able to read obscure books like the Tibetan book of the dead, the Egyptian book of the dead. They all explore how consciousness survives death.
Thats why if you actually study the material you will start to understand why things are this way. If you want that evidence and proof, go lobby your congressmen and senators to force the US to declassify it. This is classified 2-3 points above top secret. You actually have to read alot and understand whats actually going on. The good thing is a global disclosure is underway, if you are paying any attention at all to whats going on with the mexico/ peru alien bodies. They are authentic in everyway. At this point its a game of waiting, this will come out sooner or later.
Not only that, but we have been exposed to a soft type of disclosure, through our movies, tv shows and even music sometimes. How can you keep a secret for so long? you hide it in plain sight, you put it in our culture and movies so when someone says they had contact with these beings it can be easily dismissed. You can say you probably saw it from a movie, or a dream, or something. Because it all permeates in our culture so extensively.
Creative but dubious authenticity/credibility.
Still, may have something useful inside it.
The fact our current (very limited!) human science is not able to detect any "soul" or "spiritual body" inside us does not mean it/they do(es) not exist. :)
Soul may be proven to exist in 1-2 centuries from now and then it could be a scientific fact, unlike now.
That thing is no bot that transcript and many others on that website were written from 1970-ongoing, that session is from 2006. We had no AI then, at least publicly. It has already been proven my friend, but yes our science cannot understand consciousness because it exists outside of space and time. It is proven... theoretically, we just dont have the tech to actually detect it yet. But maybe as you say in time indeed. We are living in the most exciting of times, where our reality is every more science fiction than science fiction itself. 95% of all the energy in the universe is unobservable to us, we only see such a small array of the light that exists in the whole universe. 5% constitutes all the matter, planets, in the all of the galaxies in this universe. That 95 breaks down to 27% dark matter, and 68% dark energy. That dark energy, I term 'god', it is the cosmic consciousness that allows the universe to expand, and grow indefinitely. That 27% dark matter is probably other universes, or densities/dimensions of existence. Can you imagine the 250 billion or so planets in each galaxy and then every galaxy in the universe is only 5% of all the energy in it? This means materialism has failed, thats why it is nothing but a holographic illusion. We cannot explain reality using that 5% matter, imagine trying to understand 95% of the energy in the universe through that 5%, its deluded and misguided. the universe is nothing but energy and vibration- Nikola Tesla.
I am still studying this very deeply, and I can confidently say that we are way more than we are let to believe.
How can you type this? You literally contradict yourself 3 times in this sentence. Proven, theory, and undetectable are all COMPLETELY contradictory, it cannot be all 3.
A theory is by definition unproven.
Undetectable is by definition unproven.
You fail to even have a basic grasp on language, let alone science
Nothing you dragged into this about dark energy even remotely correlates to the rest of your nonsense. It's a typical nonsequitor, dropping pointless unrelated theory in order to justify a position that data doesn't relate to at all
Yes yes, the same appeal every bit of quackery makes. Listen, I keep an open mind, but not so open my brain falls out.
Make your arguments from authority. Make your emotional appeals. Claim nothing is knowable, but the nothing you know is just a smidge better than everyone else's nothing. Pretend like the only reasonable option is devote 10,000 hours of study of the material so one can make an informed decision, and then move the goal post when a person doesn't come to your conclusions.
You have your unsinkable rubber ducky, but it's not bath time here I'm afraid.
Like I said, pseudo-science and quackery are a hobby of mine, and I can recognize the telltale tracks left when it crosses my path. Perhaps if you had put the same amount of effort into my hobby, as you had into your beliefs, you'd feel different about how nothing is knowable.
I learned a long time ago things are knowable. And claiming otherwise is just a way for someone justify intellectual laziness and protects beliefs that can't actually survive scrutiny, and scrutiny is effectively not allowed anyway.
Have to disappoint you, not really! :)
You talk about the year 2006, but see here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ELIZA
Quote --> "ELIZA is an early natural language processing computer program created from 1964 to 1967[1] at MIT."
So, much, much earlier than 2006 and still somewhat earlier than 1970+. :)
It better have those unsinkable rubber duckies in it, too. Quack.