Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
Does the game have its own launcher?
There isn't really another way to measure it.
Renaming is just cosmetic, though, as the functionality remains the same. Which is a good thing. I rather not have Steam become spyware on a level where it exactly sees what one does on the computer.
It’s deliberate malicious compliance by Valve after being found guilty of violating basic consumer rights.
This is false.
Yes, we are aware of your source.
And then retaliated by making a very short window to accept refunds?
They lost a lawsuit in Australia for misrepresenting the rights of consumers there. The judge even sided with Valve on denying the refunds.
Out of the 4(?) points in the lawsuit, they only lost in one. That is because a rep from Valve said they did not have to give them a refund based on Australian consumer policy. Everything else was sided toward Valve.
Ironically, Valve's refund window is only surpassed by GoG who offer 30 days. To get one within that time, you have to work with them to make sure the product is actually broken. Refusal to work with them to resolve the issue can very much result in your refund being denied.
Before it was a case by case basis. After the lawsuit they adopted the blanket policy. The lawsuit didn't make them do so.