Installera Steam
logga in
|
språk
简体中文 (förenklad kinesiska)
繁體中文 (traditionell kinesiska)
日本語 (japanska)
한국어 (koreanska)
ไทย (thailändska)
Български (bulgariska)
Čeština (tjeckiska)
Dansk (danska)
Deutsch (tyska)
English (engelska)
Español - España (Spanska - Spanien)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanska - Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (grekiska)
Français (franska)
Italiano (italienska)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesiska)
Magyar (ungerska)
Nederlands (nederländska)
Norsk (norska)
Polski (polska)
Português (Portugisiska – Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugisiska - Brasilien)
Română (rumänska)
Русский (ryska)
Suomi (finska)
Türkçe (turkiska)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamesiska)
Українська (Ukrainska)
Rapportera problem med översättningen
They decided.
On January 1st. 2024, the Steam client will no longer function on Windows 7.
Just like they did for 98/2000 and Windows XP.
That's nice. But it doesn't change anything. You have the option of upgrading to a supported system be it Windows or something else, or you accept your games will no longer be accessible. Valve don't care about that 1% of their user base that only plays old games and have no intention of buying newer games in the future.
To brutally honest, such customers are nothing more than a drain on Steam. If you're not generating profits for Valve, then they are not going to be inclined to keep you around through expending resources. That's just good business acumen. If you were current customer, then you'd be shifting to a supported OS anyway, so again, no need to expend resources supporting something is obsolete.
Steam does this for all operating systems. Linux versions get support dropped, Mac versions get support dropped... This is not a Windows only thing. It's been an operating system thing since... well since Steam has existed.
Only being aware of Steam doing it, doesn't make for very strong arguments that they should not.
Hell its been a software thing for as long as OS's have existed....
If there has been upset customers / consumers and likely there will be again the next time users are required to upgrade. Does this not make a good case for ' hey ok we will make a lite offline version ' ?
When / if I release games on Steam I would be happy for windows 7 and simpler machines to run them.
For two reasons
1. more money to fill my little pockets.
2. more people to enjoy gaming.
As if i didn't know it. That's for Windows 8.1 and earlier versions. I repeat again again and again, i didn't write my solution for a specific OS, i am talking about future. Don't act like i didn't mention this already.
If you didn't like my idea on the matter, then i must say that i do not offer free espressos for the posters. I mean, no need to waste your time here if you don't want this solution to become a reality and arrive later on a future Steam Client version (i don't give an exact year).
Regards.
As games progress, they will stop supporting Windows 7 due to the limitations on the hardware and OS. We are already starting to see this now.
There isn't near enough revenue generated by the amount of users on Windows 7 to make any noticeable dent if it were to suddenly disappear. You're talking about barely 1% or current users.
It will be the same for the future. There's literally nothing saying it won't.
Things change, rules change, life changes.
Show me anything that says they would consider a lite launcher for the future.
Actually that is a fact, there is nothing saying they will do your solution or anything else. In fact every bit of evidence including the fact that they have done the identical process multiple times shows its highly unlikely.
Right now its far more likely for them to do exactly as they communicated 6+ months ago. There is 0 evidence to support any other claim other then wishful thinking and denial.
those 1% of users have money. I do not know the numbers but to me 1% is 1% of income.
My games will not require a lot to run at least the first of released ones will not.
Think of the small amount of users from the xp and other stone tool users. That is not a lot of people nowadays but the good will of some of those people who were felt pushed to upgrade may cost customers.
"I will upgrade but I will not use Steam anymore" I cannot say how many users over the previous years have said / done this and cannot say how many in the future will but to me thats all revenue and keeping happy customers is always preferable to having begrudging ones as well as losing some.
It doesn't matter if you know if you're also holding out hope that there's still decisions being made on the subject that might yield different outcomes. At the moment there's no evidence to suggest that is the case, so all your "Valve will have to decide", because you believe your ideas are so compelling the discussion is re-opened is your own invention.
Valve has already decided.
Well, yes, I suppose forever is a long time. Of course by that point you likely won't have anything to do with that future decision anyway. The circumstances and level of support would likely be different than what you're selling today.
1% is 1%.
Doesn't matter what users say. Half of them say they are suing Steam, yet there are no lawsuits over the upgrade now or previously.
Begrudging customers will get over it. The customers they lose aren't worth keeping.