Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
Funnily enough quite some people, also from this thread, actually use multiple stores, including Epic. It seems the narrative fallout guy is pushing, isn't actually there.
"deeply hurts Steam"
"please stop trying to manipulate ppl on Steam"
>Tries to gaslight everyone
>paid influencing doesn't exist
>can't figure out why ppl buy on Steam
"it border lines as counter productive to steam when you have steam users purposely trying to sabotage others who bring up questions about steam policy and how steam is allowing certain dangerous things to take place."
Omegalul. You really are trying to gaslight the feck out of people really hard.
Would love for a mod to just straight up ban this guy for abusing alt accounts to try gas lighting people with his nonfactual rhetoric
I don't know dude, I've met some pretty nutty adults. You're right though. Sometimes we need to step back and ask ourselves who we are arguing with. Sometimes I'll get into a heated argument with someone online and I'll ask myself, "What if this person is eight years old?". I would feel pretty silly arguing so vehemently against an eight year old if we were face to face and in person.
you will see a lot of lay off with programmers/artists in the future, the automation is the future.
You may also want to read this:
https://sac.epicgames.com/en-US/overview
Epic stated they let go 16% of their employees, a total of 830, that makes it 5,187 employees, not 2,200.
at the same time people use that image you shared earlier wrong, because people use it to show "Epic pays people to use forums/reddit" type statements, when all that image showed is using their support a creator initiate along with using paid influencers to disrupt the growth, influencers being what they showed gaming streamers from Youtube/Twitch. Nothing about that showed anything about secretly having people on forums/reddit.
Depends on how you define "influencer" then.
It's certainly not proof that Epic pays people to talk them up of the forums, but there are people who seem to make it their job to talk up Epic and spread FUD about Steam on various places online. Whether Epic is paying these users or not is a matter of contention, but the fact that they exist and the fact that Epic does in fact pay "influencers" to "disrupt Steam's organic traffic flow" has to at least raise an eyebrow.
This war isn't certainly short of cannonfodder in either side who will throw themselves into the fray for free.
OTOH Astroturfing and troll farms isn't anything new or alien to businesses. So I never fully discard the possibility. (An example I like to share is how the subject of 'Steam revenue share' started to be a discussion topic out of the blue just a little bit before the release of the Epic Store. And although correlation doesn't mean causation it's a correlation I keep finding interesting)
As a funny note. I've recently read how some very vocal defenders of Epic on Reddit seem to have vanished from the face of earth just in time with Epic's layoffs (Again correlation vs causation)
I'm not sure how far I'd read in to that. My understanding is that the US is still largely at-will when it comes to employment and it could just as easily be rank and file employees not looking to trash their workplace out of fear of being fired. It'll be interesting to see if any turn back up and what their attitudes are then.
If a games company deserves to fail simply because it abandons it's flagship franchise, does that mean Valve deserves to fail because it gave up on Half-Life 3?
Yeah I always found that debate topic highly suspicious, because we've had nearly 20 years to talk about that topic, yet it only ever surfaced when EGS showed up, more specifically when Tim kept parroting that rev split, to a point where anyone on the side of EG always, always brings up the rev split, and I feel like it's done entirely in bad faith (because none of these people actually cared about the split in all these years, and only parrot because a CEo kept saying it).
There's a user called Einsburg who constantly finds any and every board or social media space that contains the word "Epic games" and basically debates to high dawn, and he only ever showed up the moment EGS showed up (Around that same time his Twitter account was created). He is definitely someone who can be considered a turfer, though many of us do not believe he is paid, but that he does this for free, though it is highly strange in that he argues 24/7 nearly everywhere.