Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
Regras e diretrizes para discussões
Denunciar esta mensagem
What a weird question. He pointed out the reviews, which ARE Mostly Negative (look it up yourself, ffs he even gave you a DIRECT LINK THERE), how does him playing the game make any difference in whether other people review the game badly?
So, the review system is working good, displaying and accounting player's opinions, contrary to what OP claimed.
The reason the review score is negative, is because the original 2 days of the negative reviews are still counted as they weren't drastically more reviews than the average, it's only everything after that which is being ignored in the score.
I guess there is room to debate what is off topic.
It's always an issue with paid games that have a free tier whether it's fully playable for free only at first, or permanently. There's usually a happy compromise, where the free players can still do everything but with more work.
Really if they made things so bad for the free players, eventually the game would die since the paid players wouldn't have enough weaker players to bully! lol
I've played the game since tanks just came out (which is ancient history) and the economy issue is arguably one of the worst issues in a game in gaming history. The sheer ignorance Gaijin displayed and lack of action to solve the issue when content creators and the playerbase alike are all unified under that fact was shocking. The new Major Update announced even worse economy changes which produced a very valid response in the form of "review bombing."
First, I want to get this straight. "Review Bombing" is a term used to discredit what's actually going on. A large amount of the playerbase is pissed. It's that simple. The fact they all decided to organize and express their discontent is not "off topic" and does not deserve censure.
Every single negative review (obviously not every single one but you get the point) stems from an issue the player experienced in the game that did not make it enjoyable.
Second, reviews that are short are still valid, whether they are positive or negative. Making a review is not an impulsive decision like buying something you don't really need to. You must experience the product, have something happen that triggers the response to write a review, and then actually write the review. Even if a review says "Game is good" or "[meme about the game]" it is still a valid review. It's not our burden to give five paragraph essays whenever we want to review a game.
Sigh.
Is the game hot garbage with P2W crap? Yeah.
No one is debating that.
Ooof.
No reviews are being censored.
Off Topic Reviews don't literally blanket eat a massive swash of reviews, not even close to how it works.
I've played worse P2W crap than War Thunder, and well, there's always Raid: Shadow Legends. :P
A large amount of players voicing discontent is perfectly valid.
Although, to be fair, humans can cause a review bomb since bots and automated systems are very notable still.
Seriously I can't get my head around people not understanding the idea of not paying money for things they don't like. Especially when you are given ample opportunity to try out the thing for free. If it's p2w and you don't like that then just stop playing. If you decide to keep playing and spend money then you weren't tricked. You simply made a choice. Otherwise you are saying that if I hand out free ice cream cones and then say you have to pay for another one then I tricked you.
In any case, this validity that keeps being brought up, I did point out the objectiveness of it.
It's similar to opinions and how everyone is entitled to them.
Lets take me for example, lets say I have a review where I claim that 30fps is perfectly acceptable for gaming (fite me!), now this is perfectly valid, insofar as it being my opinion, but I am sure there would be a LOT of users who would let me know exactly how much my opinion is worth.
Just because people are entitled to have their own opinions doesn't mean the are worth anything., that is unless they have a large backing of other users sharing that same opinion.
So if something happens and a lot of people grow dissatisfied enough with a product they will become very vocal about it.
So then we get a huge surge of reviews.
Now the system that Valve kicks in, it sees a sudden surge of reviews and they are almost all negative. Now while this does not mean it is a review bomb it does lean heavily in that direction, so as a precaution it gets classified as a suspicious surge and is likely to remain that way.
Now, what if an actual Valve employee were to come in and decide whether or not to disable the system in this instance? How would they make a judgement? They would likely have to wade through all those reviews and would be met with joke reviews and rage posts along with the more articulate and well though out reviews critical of the situation.
So if one reads two reviews, one explaining why they are dissatisfied while the other basically rolls around screaming their head off, any who reads both recognizes that the reviewers are upset (maaybe rightfully so), but ones argument clearly has more weight than the other.
As things are now, the review system can efficiently convey the situation to the customers, so all previously discussed points taken into consideration, what is the problem?
Sure but some people aren't really willing to type why they don't recommend and typing a description is mandatory. So with that we should also discredit reviews where people put 0 effort in or unrelated.