Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
But they shell out loads of cash to lock developers in to exclusive deals. It's hard to refuse an offer like that, and it takes away our freedom of choice, other than the choice to skip/wait. And it's not fair to the developers that don't want to limit themselves to 1 store, if they decline the money, EGS tells them to get lost.
And on top of all that, their portal is garbage. It lacks features, they've innovated nothing, they rely on bribes, deals, and strong-arming in order to bring in customers. Then there are several lesser reasons that people bring up, such as buggy platform, inconvenient, 40% owned by a Chinese company, and so on. But my personal biggest gripe is their attempts to buy loyalty instead of earning it.
This, if they didn't actively encourage developers to limit where we can buy our games from i'd have absolutely no issue. it's stuff like this which is why myself and others don't like them - https://www.pcgamesn.com/metro-exodus/metro-exodus-physical
Literally a game that was going to be on steam that they bribed the developer to pull and restrict where people could buy it from.
Just like I thought of Stadia or did about Origin for many years.
And unlike with Orign, Epic still hasn't given me reasons to change my mind.
I don't "hate" them for either of those things.
I mildly dislike them for exclusives. And I've already got Steam, Ubisoft, Origin, and Battle . net (plus Playstation). . . I've got launcher/account fatigue - it'll take a lot more than some bribes to get me to make Yet Another Account that I don't want or need. /meh
Why does everything need to be a love/hate relationship?
I don't hate them. I take my free games, and that's it. I don't *need* them.
If they want to sell games to me, they have to do something. I don't know what that "something" could be, though -- I guess I'll find out when I buy a game from them.
Never even installed the client. Mainly because 95% of those games i already owned on Steam and the rest just did not entice me enough.
At the end i asked them to delete my account at the end of last year, i would never use it anway.
I give them that account deletion is super easy on the EPIC STORE.
Just a button press in your profile and then you dont log in for 14 days.
And the account goes "poof".
Maybe a bit too easy that they dont want any proof of ownership at all to delete the account but oh well.
Seriously, they just delete accounts without proof of ownership? that's ♥♥♥♥♥♥ up
Well you need to be logged into the account in question but yeah, then its just a button press in your account settings. Then you get logged out automatically and as long as you dont log in again in 14 days the account gets deleted.
Did not ask me for anything apart from that.
First, the amount is a joke at scale. 5% of $60 is $3. To get back a usable $60, you'd have to spend $1200 in 25 months exclusively on EGS.
Second, there are stipulations. Publishers can opt-out of accepting the credit on purchases of their games.
This is a "glitter coat". It's a surface-level incentive meant to appear like a deal when it hardly has any impact and covers some other poor practice. I've seen it compared to credit card cashback deals, but those are hardly any better. At scale they provide a benefit, but they're still minor and are used to distract from exploitative interest rates that generate more that the 5% the company "lost".