Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (латиноам. испанский)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
Правила обсуждений
Пожаловаться
I don't recall any news about that, and it would be everywhere.
Weird.
https://gg.deals/blog/the-origin-store-is-officially-closed-all-games-are-now-available-on-eacom/
Edit: Lol potato beat me to it
Oh. I see.
Sorry, I misunderstood what he was saying.
Also, I don't pay attention to news sources any more.
I mean, your " i did not hear of that at all" is kinda explained by " i don't pay attention to news sources any more" , dont you think?
I'll be honest, I missed the news though it does not make much of difference since I didn't care for Origin, and I doubt the EA App is any different.
And how does it install games if it can't communicate with the verification servers hmmm? See that's the cruxz. COmmunication. The clinet relies on certain APIs and libraris, as well as certificates and protiocols in windows. If windows doesn't have those, then there can be no communication. SImple as.
Window 7 was the last Windows OS that did not REQUIRE 'support' from Microsoft. It continued to support the extra little things like Windows Defender to this day, and since Windows 7 did not launch with security there are plenty of third party security suites that work better than Defender and are free as well. Add in the ability to wait on bugged patches until Microsoft fixes the patches that 8/10/11 lack (this happens more than you would think) and the catchup that Microsoft had to do to compete with the 'Dark Web Version' as far as security goes means you end up with one of the most stable secure version of Windows around (if updated and cared for properly instead of just keeping it out of laziness). as for keeping Win8, a few systems can run 8 but not 10.
99% true, some of the systems made right before Win 8 was rolling out could handle 8 but not 10, so there might be some cost for some people.
Systems manufactured with Windows 8 pre-installed will run 10 just fine. If a system could run 8 but not 10 then it most likely couldn't run 8.1 either, and that was some very early x64 processors that were like that, I think the original Athlon 64 for instance lacking the CMPXCHG16B instruction. Windows 10 (and 11 to be honest) also work fine on WDDM 1.2 and 1.3 drivers, you just don't get any of the enhancements from WDDM 2.x/3.x drivers.
they lack the ability to wait on specific patches. if you know a patch is bugged you can simply not install it on 7 until Microsoft releases a non-bugged patch. 8 and on you can only delay patching for 2 weeks.
"Systems manufactured with Windows 8 pre-installed will run 10 just fine." this is correct and has nothing to do with what i said, given that some systems were made with the paper requirements before 8 was released, and could run 8, but could not run 10 later on. they were obviously not sold with an OS installed that wasn't released yet, unless it was an indie outfit that loaded 8 on after it was released for a system they built pre-release.