Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
Is it a valid reason to put in a review? Yes because a review is personal to the writer and it could help to forewarn others who also suffer with motion sickness that it may be an issue for them.
Not saying that at all.
I'll clarify: If you cannot recommend a game and that is based on what you consider to be a failure of gameplay ex. UI, FPS, poor story, lack of good content, pc agenda, etc etc then by all means give it thumbs down.
However if your reason for thumbdown is purely based on a physical condition that makes the game unplayable for you, then - you should either not review it or explicitly state in your review the caveat that for those who have your physical condition the game may not be playable and the thumbdown is only for those players with your physical condition and that players who don't share your condition should move on to other reviews.
Clear enough?
Listen: Valve does not give an "informational" option for reviews. All they give is "Recommended" or "Not Recommended" and the option to upvote, downvote, and report reviews. If someone has a problem with the operation of a game, they have the option to "not recommend" a game on those grounds. If you don't agree with a review's quality or content, downvote it. If you think it's abusive or off-topic, report it.
But yes, there are games that are manageable or that player can get used to. Nevertheless, still it needs to have settings that user can change for it.
People are not going to force themselves to play a game that will constantly make them nauseous, vomit, sickening. What a sick behavior that is. Someone who actually would do this constantly should go to mental hospital to get themselves checked out.
Irt is worth noting that whether or not the game triggers motion sickness can be a result from a lack of certain options by the dev. Like thge ability to to reduce disable, screen bob an, sway and shaking.
1 game i play that does this to me in particular, is graveyard keeper, never gave it a negative review over the issue, even tho the issue was the game being poorly coded and the devs ignoring the performance issues (including tons of bugs), but when i realized they ditched the game in that poor state to go make another game and year or so later find them shoehorning an advertisement in the main menu of graveyard keeper.... thats when i start giving negative reviews.
No controller support?
No ultrawide support?
There's a rainbow flag in the game?
Truth is you can't take Steam reviews seriously. Proof here:
https://store.steampowered.com/app/1591290/Tree_Simulator_2022/
So if a game gives you motion sickness that means the game is bad?
You see, just another reason to implement neutral reviews. Thank you.
I'm afraid you must improve your reading skills, dear friend.
So you think the user mentioned leaves a positive review when a game gives him motion sickness?
You sound so confused, but don't worry, I can make it simple for you:
Popular games have thousands and thousands of reviews, the chances of people reading your review are tiny. Therefore, explaining that the game is not bad and you just gave it a thumbs down because of motion sickness is irrelevant.