Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
and stuff for big companies. .
i googles.... is this you...
A power user is a user of computers, software and other electronic devices, who uses advanced features of computer hardware, operating systems, programs, or websites which are not used by the average user.
Admittedly it does also require at least the pro version to take full control.
QDos is the only real OS!
Aside from that, people were saying the same things about XP and 7 when support ended
and we're still here
Important NOTE
XP was successful
Vista was a failure (I had it wasn't that bad)
Win 7 was successful
Win 8 was a failure
Win 10 is successful
Win 11 will probably be a Failure again (I have it, it's not that bad)
the point of every 2nd windows fails since windows me
and we are still getting a windows who the most people like
As far as bugs go, the taskbar has a doozy. It is simply obstructed by windows. So even a auto hiding taskbar requires some work to access. I notice any more in the short time.
Personally, I judge OSs on criteria that include versatility and reliability, both of which MS has been dumping,
Not updating to any windows, sticking to Linux from now on (recently moved gaming rig over to Linux, quite happy with it).
10 jumped the shark, so I didn't bother with it. Stuck with 7 on the gaming rig until I switched it to Linux.
Security updates? Don't care. Run an application firewall, turn off all the networked services, keep the browser updated, and the security concerns for a normal user are mostly in the domain of "don't install random crap, use vetted programs, careful where you browse". That's a concern no matter how up to date the OS Is.
If it turns out I need windows for anything I'll maybe give it a PCI passthrough VM to fire up on occasion. Sure as hell not paying a license fee.
It's smug, but I'm a little amused when people talk about the next windows and ask "are you picking A, or B?" as if those are the only choices. Or buy into microsoft's marketing hype or memes about updates and security. If it's getting serious flaws patched every month, is there really any point at which it is actually secure, at all?
It's a fairly easy "just works, mostly" for a lot of things, but as an OS to run on your own hardware I find windows a complete joke. Pay people money to get your data? lol. google are giant asshats too, but at least they have the near-decency to not ask money in return for everything they hoover up from you.
ms, however, wants to have their cake and eat it too, but also you should provide them with a cake for their services additionally as well too also.
And then I stop for a moment to remember the sheer amount of crap microsoft has done, the choice is pretty easy.
"Frack windows!" [found grafittied on the walls of the starship Battlestar Galactica]
The days when windows was a necessity are ending.
Nope :D
Win95 was universally hated for its instability. Nobody was happy with it when it was current, nobody missed it when it was gone.
Win98SE was quite ok. Issues had been sorted out.
Win ME was crap and nobody liked it. Nobody talked fondly of it in the years following.
Windows XP was all in all quite good.
Windows Vista was crap and everyone hated it. Nobody speaks fondly of it or ever has.
Windows 7 was pretty solid.
Windows 8 was a flop. While not vista level awful, it was loved by nobody, and there's none around who'll tell you about the good old days of win8.
Win 10, well.. I have my misgivings, but at least people found it worked for them.
Win 11 - we'll see.
It's not a case of rose tinted retrospective glasses. They've made plenty of crap nobody liked, now, then, or ever. And looking at microsoft's portfolio of failed big projects and flops, skepticism by default makes perfect sense.
ps: If the new thing is always bad by default, then is seen as good later, perhaps it's matter of constantly seeing things relatively / in comparison, because it keeps getting worse 😁
Its always the new that gets bashed. It is amusing to watch when people chose blinders over the bigger picture.
Doesn't negate the case history I just listed. The new thing is often bad, and the previous thing is often not loved contemporarily or retrospectively 😎
So according to you, 98SE, XP and 7 were good AND THOSE ARE EXACTLY THOSE I'M TALKING ABOUT!
So sticking with the pattern that you established (I'm not negating it, I'm building on it), I've personally seen the support end of XP, I've personally seen the support end of 7. Always the same drama. Always people blissfully forgetting how things have been a couple years ago (and will be a couple years later down the line).
For the processor family, go to registry key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\Setup\MoSetup (create if missing) and add a value AllowUpgradesWithUnsupportedTPMOrCPU that is a REG_DWORD of 1.
If you are booting via MBR, follow these instructions then try again - https://www.windowscentral.com/how-convert-mbr-disk-gpt-move-bios-uefi-windows-10
This will also make any TPM 2.0 device properly functional, as TPM 2.0 only works on UEFI and not legacy/CSM boot.
If you legitimately don't have a TPM, look into Rufus - https://rufus.ie/en/ - which will create a USB stick from a Windows 11 ISO that bypasses the system requirements checks.