Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
They made the deck because there was a lack of hardware in the 'portable device that can run PC games for gaming'... But it makes no sense to make custom hardware for desktop gaming because PCs already exist.
I wouldn't mind a Steam Controller 2.0, though.
The Steam Deck is different due to it's formfactor. The Steam Controller is... novel. But really impractical, and a nightmare to set up mappings for.
I don't think STEAM has what it takes to compete with Xbox, play station and others, plus....STEAM'S customer base is primarily PC.
Yet they are buying a handheld console.
Yeah but you were saying Steam's customer base is primarily PC as a justification to why they shouldn't try, Yet, here we are, a primarily PC userbase buying a handheld console.
And also there's nothing wrong with expanding your userbase, in fact, it's healthy.
How many desktop PC-Gaming devices were?
PC Gamers don't need a 'console' to plug in their home TV because their PCs already serve for that. Playing their PC games on the go was a total different subject.
That's what people were saying about the Deck, too. That there was no audience for it, that PC gamers wouldn't want to play their libraries on a tiny screen. and yet here we are, Valve's console is actually selling.
People speaking on behalf of all PC gamers on matters such as these are always wrong because the PC gaming community is comprised of a multitude of personality types with different wants and needs. Which is why the Deck is proving successful. Not every PC gamer is gonna buy one, but enough are buying it to make it a successful endeavour.
There's plenty of people out there with absolutely loaded Steam accounts that would love to play their libraries on their 75" TV without running an HDMI cable from the next room or dealing with Steam Link lag.
A Steam console would be a better option for a lot of Steam users compared to buying an Xbox and rebuilding their libraries from scratch just so they could play their games hassle free on an HDTV.
Yes, we are aware.
And a Steam console would allow them to play their libraries in the living room without an HDMI cable running from another room or without the lag from Steam Link.
I seriously doubt many PC users will invest money to buy a console for their PC games when there are other, (probably) less expensive options.
As I already said...STEAM tried this before and it failed, and who made it has ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ to do with it.....it was a STEAM product designed to compete with consoles.
When Valve first came up with the steam machine, many people were questioning the logic of it, and ridiculed the prices.
QUery WHy would Valve want to take a back step that would be doing a console?
Any M-ATX system could basically do this, not to mention laptops, etc. What would I be able to do with a console that I wouldn't be able to do better with a pc?
You can repeat this all you want, it doesn't stop being a bad argument, plenty of Ideas that don't succeed in their first iteration.
Steam Machines were third party, and it's obvious Valve has gained experience in the hardware space since the Steam controller, now they are in a position of making these consoles themselves and have them live up to a guaranteed standard of quality, just like the Deck.
As they did with the deck, and here we are.