Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
Stop comparing online world to the outside world. I thought people realized this point got busted ages ago. You can't code the door, but you can spare 2 hours of your life and make a simple distinction, define into the algorithm what a curse and what a malicious link is.
I thought Valve was a professional company, but admittedly they're just some lazy dudes nowadays. Stop holding their hand, people like you who support a lazy company are just as bad.
It's easy, it can be done, it should be done.
Not your call to make and the people who do call the shots have said it's not happening. Deal with it.
Treating security issues the same as moral issues was a bad design from the start and it should be fixed - the filter split into two - so people don't all have to share in this kind of word aversion.
There'd be a mass outcry if Valve treated its users as infants to this degree in, say, the game store, which is why Steam lets people say "yeah, I'm an adult, I choose to see this". But suggest the same approach to the written word and you get much more conservative responses. A lot of people go right back to arguing at the level of all those Moms Against Gaming type organisations, preaching that if something contains the behaviour they object to (words: swearing; games: violence) then it must be inherently worthless filth, or worrying that if you don't block it that will encourage it to "spread". Think of the children!
So you can link me to a Valve statement on the matter? I see the mods make such statements regularly, but they don't speak for Valve's developers; their predictions about what will happen are no more valuable than yours or mine.
The fact that it has been requested a ton of times through the years, and it's still not possible, take that as a "hint" from Valve.
But anyway, no thanks, I won't take that as a hint; I consider this idea pretty faulty logic. If Valve not having said anything is a statement that they don't want a particular feature, that would mean that even the very day before something gets announced and implemented (with Valve that tends to be the same day), they have no plans to do it. Which is clearly absurd. The day before Valve put a music player in Steam you'd be telling me that all the times it's been suggested and the fact it hasn't happened yet is a hint from Valve that there won't be a music player in Steam. No, it's not.
Valve are not a talkative company. A lack of information is just a lack of information.
Thats like complaining you want a drink with a glass of milk in front of you, but refusing it because it isnt water.
You play in someone else's pool you follow their rules. Either accept that or buy your own pool.
We can all play these silly games. If you're not interested in discussing a particular matter, feel free to not post, etc.
It's not about, what people care to see or not, it's about, profanity is against the rules, if Valve made it optional, they would make people belive it is ok to use profanity.
As already told, even if the filter is changing the words into hearts, the moderators could still issue warnings or even ban for breaking the rules.
Why is it some people think profanity is so important, adult and civilized people do not need it to make their points.