Sexual, borderline point shop content

[Buttbeef Von Schlippenztein]

I think there needs a bit more regulation on what kind of content should be brought up in the points shop, for instance;

A lot of recent content from 'pornographic' games have released 'avatars' 'profile backgrounds, mini backgrounds' etc. With some of them having rather over borderline suggestive animations from; Lapdancing/ Rubbing to the tweasing of underwear and bra's all within rather high in sexual content.

There are users in steam below age of 18.

How does Valve/Steam take precautions to prevent sexual content from being tossed either intentionally or accidently to the views of minors.

Yes; The games are behind a age lock, but the avatars/Backgrounds and your general community profile modifications are not.

[FOXDUDE69]

Цитата допису Aachen:

Why would Disney stridently object to .... anthropomorphic animals? :kentconfused:

You had to omit the word "sexualized" in order to make your joke.

[Aachen]

Цитата допису FOXDUDE69:

You had to omit the word "sexualized" in order to make your joke.

You think they’re going to object to sexualized anthropomorphized animals where they would not do so for sexualized humans?

[Hanzo The Rain]

Цитата допису Supercar11:

Why so many hentai Neko stuff on the steam points store???

I’m just asking nothing else

Anime, Ecchi and Hentai has been normalized and gone mainstream. Gone are the days when it was a taboo to talk about it.

Look at high % of sales, positive ratings and reviews. Valve sees them as $$$.

It’s 2021, you gotta stop being a bigot and accept them. Deal with it.

[FOXDUDE69]

Цитата допису Aachen:

Цитата допису FOXDUDE69:

You had to omit the word "sexualized" in order to make your joke.

You think they’re going to object to sexualized anthropomorphized animals where they would not do so for sexualized humans?

You think they're gonna keep selling their games with family friendly cartoon animals on Steam when they realize Steam also sells furry content?

[Aachen]

So far it seems to be the case, doesn’t it?

How do you know the company’s awareness level about Steam’s products?

[Seraphita]

Imagine claiming with a straight face "Disney isn't gonna agree with furry content". This is the funniest thing ever. I love how some people frown upon furries so much they think the world around them dislikes it as much as they do. It's also Disney we talk about. Ridiculous, tbh.

[Haruspex]

Цитата допису FOXDUDE69:

Цитата допису Aachen:

You think they’re going to object to sexualized anthropomorphized animals where they would not do so for sexualized humans?

You think they're gonna keep selling their games with family friendly cartoon animals on Steam when they realize Steam also sells furry content?

Why not? They happily feature on television services where the Disney Channel and Nickelodeon are just a few pages away from the porn channels. Disney magazines can be found on the same news stands as Penthouse and Playboy.

I doubt they like it, but from a business perspective the Steam user base is hard to ignore. Some bet against it staying that way, but it doesn't usually last too long. (See Microsoft and EA.)

[Paratech2008]

Roger Rabbit sure had Jessica Rabbit...Not Porn but definitely sex sells.

[FOXDUDE69]

Цитата допису Aachen:

So far it seems to be the case, doesn’t it?

How do you know the company’s awareness level about Steam’s products?

Disney is a very image focused brand. Their image is everything. You know Moana is known as Vaiana in Europe simply because they didn't want the character to be associated with an obscure italian pornstar that hasn't even been alive since the 90's? So, yeah. I think they aren't even aware furry content is being sold on Steam.

And the fact that the companies that pulled their advertisement off of youtube were also oblivious until a news article or two bought it to their attention is also a good indication of how clueless big companies can be.

[Mad Scientist]

Цитата допису FOXDUDE69:

Цитата допису Aachen:

So far it seems to be the case, doesn’t it?

How do you know the company’s awareness level about Steam’s products?

Disney is a very image focused brand. Their image is everything. You know Moana is known as Vaiana in Europe simply because they didn't want the character to be associated with an obscure italian pornstar that hasn't even been alive since the 90's? So, yeah. I think they aren't even aware furry content is being sold on Steam.

And the fact that the companies that pulled their advertisement off of youtube were also oblivious until a news article or two bought it to their attention is also a good indication of how clueless big companies can be.

When they change their image toward angering customers and making people sick of their crap, one could argue disney only cares of their political image; not what made them primarily popular to begin with. Their recent treatment towards people and more major stories of such go to show pure greed and political nature rather than being the original kind of disney; make good stuff, make it popular, sell the popular thing.

Now, it's politics mixed in with popular purchased properties, so they're constantly shooting themselves in the foot and wondering why they need to keep laying people off other than the park closures.

Youtube being poorly ran by some of the biggest executive idiots on the planet next to most big tech is the cause of their own problems; not sticking to the root of the companies and becoming also political hacks handholding and backpatting each other which I stated before. If they got someone in charge that remembers it was about "Broadcast Yourself", it would be ran not only profitably, but more neutrally and geared towards creators, not protecting certain politics/people over everyone else. The whole dislike bit being removed from public view is a fine example of "stick fingers in ears, close eyes, pretend like the place isnt on fire".

They know advertisers they lose especially in numbers because they've been losing money and have been pushing their premium version of YT due to losing money.

YT is not Valve.

Цитата допису FOXDUDE69:

You think they're gonna keep selling their games with family friendly cartoon animals on Steam when they realize Steam also sells furry content?

Yes, because they are not the same companies nor does one have anything to do with the other in terms of content. If one was to apply this question replacing animals/furries to anything else, you could see why they would not care.

Some games on Steam you kill people/zombies with vehicles, would pixar & disney stop making the "Cars" series or anything with vehicles because of that? No.

[Paratech2008]

Disney deals with GOG and they had nude calendars ax freebies in the Witcher 1 and 2, they didn't care. Witcher 3 has nudity... Disney still works with gaming businesses regardless of what they sell....

[captainwiseass]

If Disney doesn't mind porno being available on Amazon -- and it very much doesn't -- then it's not going to care about porno being available on Steam, either.

[Paratech2008]

Disney only cares about money. They want to make as much as possible. As long as other businesses don't hurt their bottom line they don't care...

[Seraphita]

Цитата допису Paratech2008:

Disney only cares about money. They want to make as much as possible. As long as other businesses don't hurt their bottom line they don't care...

Yeah, Disney+ said hi a while ago, too. Disney doesn't care about their audience as much as they used to anymore. Now, they only care about money and baiting people to their stuff.

[Sleepy Yoshi]

*looks at the R-rated and TV MA movies on Disney+*
*looks at the content including some very ecchi anime on Hulu*
*looks at the content that airs on FX*

Yep...they're completely concerned with keeping that wholesome image these days. /s
Disney not only does business with companies that host raunchy content of all kinds, but as a company they have their fingers in plenty of dirty adult pies.