Asenna Steam
kirjaudu sisään
|
kieli
简体中文 (yksinkertaistettu kiina)
繁體中文 (perinteinen kiina)
日本語 (japani)
한국어 (korea)
ไทย (thai)
български (bulgaria)
Čeština (tšekki)
Dansk (tanska)
Deutsch (saksa)
English (englanti)
Español – España (espanja – Espanja)
Español – Latinoamérica (espanja – Lat. Am.)
Ελληνικά (kreikka)
Français (ranska)
Italiano (italia)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesia)
Magyar (unkari)
Nederlands (hollanti)
Norsk (norja)
Polski (puola)
Português (portugali – Portugali)
Português – Brasil (portugali – Brasilia)
Română (romania)
Русский (venäjä)
Svenska (ruotsi)
Türkçe (turkki)
Tiếng Việt (vietnam)
Українська (ukraina)
Ilmoita käännösongelmasta
thanks! As long as it functions i dont give a ahit how it looks.
Me: "I see we have very different idea of clarity and ease of use".
Why is everything these days made to look like I should be using it on mobile instead of PC?
Both groups forget they make up tiny minority of malcontents. Functionally there's hardly any difference from what I can tell. Not that I ever spent much time fussing over the downloads page over the last 17 years...
/slowclap.
Great downgrade Valve. Please give me my old downloads page back.
This one looks terrible, and doesn't match the look of the rest of the Steam client.
Edit: Oh, yes, I also keep steam open on my 3rd monitor, so I get to look at this new ugliness any time I just move my eyeballs a little.
What you cannot tell, however is how much more resources Steam uses because it needs to use its bloated chromium web helper to render this newfangled pile of junk whereas the old downloads page was EXTREMELY optimized (As it was rendered using proper machine language and not handed off to an embedded webserver to serve up html/css/javashit) and used little to no resources to render and utilize. It was the only screen that I would leave the Steam Client on to eliminate as much resource usage Steam would use on my system as it wouldn't need to keep the bloated embedded-chromium processes (it runs multiple of these at the same time) running.
Once again, Valve has gone 3 steps forward with graphics, and 5 steps back with efficiency. When are they going to understand that people don't care about fancy Steam graphics as long as it's intuitive and most importantly not broken?
If I can't tell how much more resources Steam uses, then what's the problem? I've got a decent PC. I can't really say my time is best spent trying to micromanage the resource usage of a web based client. And really I've been listening to people whine and cry about browser resource usage for 20 years. It's almost a traditional complaint. But it's never been terribly rational.
And web based clients have been the trend for the last decade. Not much reason I can see for Valve to buck the trend. I mean if you know better, I'd get on that and get a business rolling to clean house. If efficiency and "proper machine code" is what really matters you should be able to prove that out and run circles around everyone.
It's like the buffoons that keep changing Steam don't even use the damn system they work on.
Now this new look of the download page is absolutly aweful, unintuitive, plain ugly as f***.
i already hate the developers for making me curse this much...
Who the hell was that idiot, thinking it would be a good idea to take so much place for simple network stats?
The new icons are ugly as hell too.
Hey if you keep going this way its, this is going to be a reason to go to epic, at least for me.
Even if their platform isn't the most beautiful, and lacks a ton of features, at least i don't get eye cancer from it.
(whoever's idea that was, enjoy your demotion)
(unless it was Gabe's... I take it all back. What an amazing change, thank you!)