Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
Any dev who wants to can use their beta section to make available older builds of their games.
It's quite a stretch to think the downloading of older depots is actually important for Steams foothold in the industry.
It would seem the relevant workaround was seen as at least as unacceptable, to hazard a guess.
O! I want to see your poll!
I think a poll would be a wonderful idea. Transparency and discussion can perhaps lead to resolutions that arent the current option.
I found out due to a comment on a youtube livestream this morning.
Hopefully Valve sees this is a terrible mistake and dont submit this into the main branch
makes absolutly no sense for anybody
Speedrunning - a niche group and the ones that require older versions are only a portion of that already niche group of users. Not really something that a company will base their decisions on.
Old hardware - Valve will always move forward. Be that with supported OS or hardware. The same goes for devs. They won't keep updating old games that have reached maturity. Usually the new version isn't even more demanding on the hardware but might actually be lighter due to optimization.
Archival purposes - Not something Valve needs to cater to.
All your reasons are niche use cases and non-factors in the bigger picture.
Zero. In twenty some years of PC gaming I can't think of too many times where my problem was (best) solved or my needs met by running an older version of a game.
Sure. No one is saying people don't have reasons or arguments. But the people you are describing. Do they make up 1% of users or 10% of users? I mean what's the breakdown of the user base in your opinion of users who really depend on this feature?
Feeling really strongly about something and being able to project doesn't necessarily make it a universal or important issue. And I would argue Valve has a lot of visibility into user behavior, if a significant number of users were really using those features, and or they brought the value you seem to be arguing Valve would be much more aware of that than you. Which begs the question, why would they remove an important feature used by a significant minority (or majority) of users. Unless maybe that's not the case at all.
Just maybe it's a big deal for you and a handful of users, but not to hundreds of millions of users.