Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
So lets say a review has 100 thumbs up and 30 thumbs down.
You only see the thumbs up. Another review has 110 thumbs up but 90 thumbs down.
The first review will be displayed over the second one as more useful because it has less thumbs down.
The reason the count of thumbs downs was made invisible is so trolls cant easily mass downvote user made content. Since you cant see the downvotes organized mass downvotes are much harder since you cant really see a direct result of such a action.
That's mostly why they're not displayed, that way a bot can keep spamming to his heart content with zero effect on the system. While if downvotes were public they could instantly see if their votes are counted or not (and adjust behaviour to not trigger the alarms)