Інсталювати Steam
увійти
|
мова
简体中文 (спрощена китайська)
繁體中文 (традиційна китайська)
日本語 (японська)
한국어 (корейська)
ไทย (тайська)
Български (болгарська)
Čeština (чеська)
Dansk (данська)
Deutsch (німецька)
English (англійська)
Español - España (іспанська — Іспанія)
Español - Latinoamérica (іспанська — Латинська Америка)
Ελληνικά (грецька)
Français (французька)
Italiano (італійська)
Bahasa Indonesia (індонезійська)
Magyar (угорська)
Nederlands (нідерландська)
Norsk (норвезька)
Polski (польська)
Português (португальська — Португалія)
Português - Brasil (португальська — Бразилія)
Română (румунська)
Русский (російська)
Suomi (фінська)
Svenska (шведська)
Türkçe (турецька)
Tiếng Việt (в’єтнамська)
Повідомити про проблему з перекладом
▶️ Google provides a ✔️ browser running under Windows XP. They didn't block it, it actively offers it.
▶️ Ubisoft provides a ✔️game client running under Windows XP. They didn't block it, it actively offers it.
▶️ Valve actively and intentionally blocked the use of any version of the ❌ client under Windows XP. Without any rational reason, Valve arbitrarily prevented anyone with Windows XP from accessing their library purchased for Windows XP.
Sooner or later, Valve will do the same with Windows 7 (officially discontinued system from Microsoft). It is unacceptable for me to never have access to my game library on this computer with Windows 7 I'm writing from, just because Valve decided to destroy Windows 7! Valve will block access. For games that run under Windows 7, just because Valve has decided that it no longer wants Windows 7 customers, it will make the game library inaccessible to them.
The question will be simple:
Why Valve has been selling services on Windows XP for x years and suddenly prevented these customers from using them on their Windows XP?
What is the reason for Valve to actively prevent customers from accessing the licenses they have purchased on Windows XP, where games still work, but Valve actively prevents their use (actively blocked access to all older clients)?
Here, Valve can list why it does not provide a version compatible with Windows XP and why from June 5, 2020 it actively blocked logging on to older versions and thus definitely actively blocked everyone from accessing the game library on Windows XP.
If you don't see the difference, that's not my problem. My request is, let Valve know! This is the official discussion forum. I can open a private request through support, but here it is public, available to anyone. This will be attached as proof of Valve's arbitrariness and his steam service. I don't need to prove my truth. Valve will prove the validity, not the customers.
I don't think I have anything more to add. I have a video of how Windows XP works. How Google Chrome works, how Uplay works and how Steam does not work. As a Valve one day it will block libraries for Windows 7 users. Just like that. Because they can.
I have a 98% complete game. Thanks to Valve's arbitrary decision to block older clients, I can't finish it. It can claim to use a different client, a different operating system.
If it works out, Valve will have to rationally justify restricting certain groups of customers due to their operating system, where it used to work so that they would then deinitively actively block it. We will see. Writing a complaint is not that difficult. Nor send it to hundreds of email addresses of MEPs.
Have a nice weekend.
Because at that time XP was there and supported. Now it isn't anymore.
They block the older ones because they're unsupported by various parties. Even newer games are not supporting the old client anymore (Borderlands 3 needs the new UI, otherwise it won't run).
Actually, you do. How about you provide evidence for your claims that customer rights have been violated? So far anything you posted is in the camp of "I want", which does not equal violated consumer rights.
Unsuported
It tells you the very moment you sign up for a Steam Account:
https://store.steampowered.com/subscriber_agreement/
Steam really ought to have some sort of solution/workaround for older systems at least for its older games.
Otherwise, it's Steam that's the bottleneck at fault. This is the problem of depending on a client.
Cool story bud. Your threats do nothing but make you look like a joke.
exactly who is responsible for "destroying" your choice of operating system? let's get all CSI and enhance the picture futher:
Hey.... seems like Valve is following the direction that everyone else in the industry is doing and abandoning old, outdated, insecure versions of WIndows.
Oh well. Technology moves on. Things become obsolete. That's literally what happens in the world.
It only appears to become obsolete because other people forcefully attach systems that require connections to other things that change.
A well-maintained system continues to be able to run the software it was able to run years ago, as long as the software hasn't changed.
Game consoles from the 90s still work to this day.
While I don't personally have Win10, based on what I've read on their game forums on Steam, the three eXceed shmups (Gun Bullet Children, Vampire REX, and Jade Penetrate Black Package) and Fortune Summoners have some nonzero chance of running into big problems with Win10.
I would expect similar issues with these older small indie games.
I've also personally had issues with running Age of Empires II (the original version, albeit maybe with a patch or two, that runs on WinXP) on Win7, and Empire Earth on Win8.1 (for quite a while, before it was patched on GOG).
Google Chrome is unsupported in XP
https://support.ubisoft.com/en-AU/Faqs/000026524/Uplay-PC-and-Windows-XP
No they dont
No because Steam, just like every other gaming client on the planet that you use, uses Chromium as its base. Chormimum stopped supporting XP. Which means Steam has to stop supporting XP because the underlying browser rendering engine its built on, stopped supporting XP.
Steam isn't going to use an older version of Chromium because that would be like saying you should run a 5 year old browser with giant security holes in it. The steam client is a very large possible vector into your system. And Steam keeps up with Chromimum updates to ensure the steam client's browser is secure from any potential web attacks
So no, Steam isn't going to put a giant sign on your computer saying "Hackers please steal all this person's stuff" because you want to run Steam on an outdated OS that only 6% of Steam users use.
Is it 'unacceptable' that you can't run Steam in MSDOS
Update ton Windows 10. Hell its FREE. So you don't even have an excuse of "it costs money".
No, all you have to do is upgrade to Window 10 and you have total access to your library. Just like when XP was deprecated, you just had to upgrade to Windows 7 or above.
Because games made under Windows XP run fine under Windows 10.
The actual question is "why are you not upgrading to windows 10 so you can easily access your entire gaming library"
Chromium is the reason
So now you know
Upgrade to Windows 10
"I will ignore all criticism because I dont want to read it" is a super hot take from someone making demands.
The 'validity' is upgrade to Windows 10
Problem solved.
steam demands to be used on Win 7, you can have XP prefix and just put steam alone into Win 7 mode, so it will run games in XP mode.
and switching to WIn10 would basically require reconfiguring a crapton of stuff on one's computer for use on a different operating system, as well as making space for a new OS, as well as dealing with various problems of programs not working under Win10.
And...seriously, changing operating system simply to make a game launcher work?
Not necessarily.
A number of older games have to be updated to work properly with recent Windows OSes; otherwise they don't work or work buggily.
The more fundamental question is "why are we locked out of access to our games that run on a given system only because the third-party launcher got updated which caused it to stop working?"
There's no need to reinvent the wheel.
Because using a so much deprecated OS like WinXP networked in this day and age is basically a risk, a liability for others and a reckless thing to do. Least of the problems of doing so is Steam not working on it.
The real fundamental question is "Why accept a license terms that warns you specifically about this specific scenario and then complain when the agreed scenario happens?"
indeed, there's no need to reinvent the wheel and to use web browser for desktop application. no one forced Valve to trash desktop app they had for steam client in favor of chromium framework. this is valve's fault for using wrong technology to create their app. why it has to be our problem now? there's no need to use web browser in the desktop app in the first place.