steelixion May 1, 2020 @ 6:43am
Ryzen 3 3200g
Is there a very big differencw between ryzen 3 3200g and ryzen 5 2600, if not ten can i go with ruzen 3 3200g cuz both have rlly big difference in price here
Originally posted by r.linder:
Originally posted by steelixion:
Originally posted by Escorve:

Best to upgrade later on, because 2200G/3200G and 2400G/3400G are not well suited for dedicated graphics, APUs are pretty cut down and really only designed to run their built-in graphics

Ryzen 3 3100X and 3300X are coming around the same time as Intel's 10th gen comet lake, full CPUs with 4 cores and 8 threads that'll smack the 3200G around for around the same price point
So i shold go for ryzen 5?

Ryzen 5 2600 or 3600 would be better.
< >
Showing 1-8 of 8 comments
nullable May 1, 2020 @ 7:46am 
The 2600 is significantly better. It has 50% more physical cores and three times as many threads available.

However if all your use cases require a minimum of multi-threading and will only ever use 1-4 threads then the 3200g should perform just about the same as the 2600. If that's not the case, the extra CPU power in the 26000 (in cores and threads) will start to add up significantly.

And I would say that unless you need the integrated graphics in the 3200g it's just a feature you're paying for instead of higher core count. But if a 3200g is all you can afford and you're hot to trot right now beggars can't be choosers. It will work fine and you can always upgrade later on.
r.linder May 1, 2020 @ 7:48am 
AMD CPUs are much better than AMD APUs.
_I_ May 1, 2020 @ 8:02am 
avoid the ryzen apus unless you are never going to add a dedicated gpu

go with a cpu and dedicated gpu instead

1600af is faster than the 3200g
or you can get the 3600 for not much more and destroy it
steelixion May 1, 2020 @ 9:29am 
Originally posted by _I_:
avoid the ryzen apus unless you are never going to add a dedicated gpu

go with a cpu and dedicated gpu instead

1600af is faster than the 3200g
or you can get the 3600 for not much more and destroy it
I am gonna get 1660 super too,
steelixion May 1, 2020 @ 9:29am 
Originally posted by Brockenstein:
The 2600 is significantly better. It has 50% more physical cores and three times as many threads available.

However if all your use cases require a minimum of multi-threading and will only ever use 1-4 threads then the 3200g should perform just about the same as the 2600. If that's not the case, the extra CPU power in the 26000 (in cores and threads) will start to add up significantly.

And I would say that unless you need the integrated graphics in the 3200g it's just a feature you're paying for instead of higher core count. But if a 3200g is all you can afford and you're hot to trot right now beggars can't be choosers. It will work fine and you can always upgrade later on.
My gpu will be 1660 super
r.linder May 1, 2020 @ 9:34am 
Originally posted by ;2271447149937500929:
Originally posted by Brockenstein:
The 2600 is significantly better. It has 50% more physical cores and three times as many threads available.

However if all your use cases require a minimum of multi-threading and will only ever use 1-4 threads then the 3200g should perform just about the same as the 2600. If that's not the case, the extra CPU power in the 26000 (in cores and threads) will start to add up significantly.

And I would say that unless you need the integrated graphics in the 3200g it's just a feature you're paying for instead of higher core count. But if a 3200g is all you can afford and you're hot to trot right now beggars can't be choosers. It will work fine and you can always upgrade later on.
My gpu will be 1660 super

Best to upgrade later on, because 2200G/3200G and 2400G/3400G are not well suited for dedicated graphics, APUs are pretty cut down and really only designed to run their built-in graphics

Ryzen 3 3100X and 3300X are coming around the same time as Intel's 10th gen comet lake, full CPUs with 4 cores and 8 threads that'll smack the 3200G around for around the same price point
Last edited by r.linder; May 1, 2020 @ 9:35am
steelixion May 1, 2020 @ 11:22am 
Originally posted by Escorve:
Originally posted by ;2271447149937500929:
My gpu will be 1660 super

Best to upgrade later on, because 2200G/3200G and 2400G/3400G are not well suited for dedicated graphics, APUs are pretty cut down and really only designed to run their built-in graphics

Ryzen 3 3100X and 3300X are coming around the same time as Intel's 10th gen comet lake, full CPUs with 4 cores and 8 threads that'll smack the 3200G around for around the same price point
So i shold go for ryzen 5?
The author of this thread has indicated that this post answers the original topic.
r.linder May 1, 2020 @ 11:53am 
Originally posted by steelixion:
Originally posted by Escorve:

Best to upgrade later on, because 2200G/3200G and 2400G/3400G are not well suited for dedicated graphics, APUs are pretty cut down and really only designed to run their built-in graphics

Ryzen 3 3100X and 3300X are coming around the same time as Intel's 10th gen comet lake, full CPUs with 4 cores and 8 threads that'll smack the 3200G around for around the same price point
So i shold go for ryzen 5?

Ryzen 5 2600 or 3600 would be better.
< >
Showing 1-8 of 8 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: May 1, 2020 @ 6:43am
Posts: 8