are you worried that The ADL wants to push Steam to increase censorship guidelines severity?

[Kzual]

I just watched youtuber TheQuartering's video from Apr. 18th about the Anti-Defamation League wanting to push tech companies like Valve to increase their control over speech on the game they offer on their platform. does this worry you?

[endrsgm]

give into a bully once...
but yeah. it's why there is a saying that once you have kids you are never free again. it's because you might be willing to pay a price but to make your kids pay it too? the whole coming after people tho is sick.
you know if I don't like what someone says I don't listen or read it or watch it. as long as its not inciting violence, child porn/etc, sedition, etc i don't care what you say. it's free speech.
Problem is wayyyy tooo many didn't take civics and don't understand that. they think if its something they disagree with h then they should be protected from hearing it lest it upset them.

[longgoneby]

cs8492님이 먼저 게시:

This is the best response til' they harass your employer and get you fired for daring to think differently. The outrage mob is dangerous to peaceful coexistance. They want people to adapt to their way or die. The normal person is caught in the crossfire.

stop using the same profile picture you have on other wesbites. Don't use the same username and have an "alt" email just for things that could be offensive. Don't have anything leading to you. Make the ADL come to the gates looking for food, but make it clear we're starved as-is.

[cs8492]

chikan님이 먼저 게시:

stop using the same profile picture you have on other wesbites. Don't use the same username and have an "alt" email just for things that could be offensive. Don't have anything leading to you. Make the ADL come to the gates looking for food, but make it clear we're starved as-is.

I have 5 emails already, lol and I recycle reddit usernames yearly. I don't like how they go after normal people. Then you get people like we had in this thread that believe in the fallacy of defense must mean you agree with them. I hate identiatrians but I believe they should be allowed any platform to exspose thier garbage like the tankies we get here. You want a picture of Hitler? Go for it, You want a picture of Stalin? That's fine. You think the world is flat? Good for you. Threaten to deplatform any of them? We have a problem. I cannot trust people that want a system to supress others speech, because historically they are the greatest threat to human life.

[longgoneby]

cs8492님이 먼저 게시:

I have 5 emails already, lol and I recycle reddit usernames yearly. I don't like how they go after normal people. Then you get people like we had in this thread that believe in the fallacy of defense must mean you agree with them. I hate identiatrians but I believe they should be allowed any platform to exspose thier garbage like the tankies we get here. You want a picture of Hitler? Go for it, You want a picture of Stalin? That's fine. You think the world is flat? Good for you. Threaten to deplatform any of them? We have a problem.

based in general.

[Mad Scientist]

chikan님이 먼저 게시:

cs8492님이 먼저 게시:

This is the best response til' they harass your employer and get you fired for daring to think differently. The outrage mob is dangerous to peaceful coexistance. They want people to adapt to their way or die. The normal person is caught in the crossfire.

stop using the same profile picture you have on other wesbites. Don't use the same username and have an "alt" email just for things that could be offensive. Don't have anything leading to you. Make the ADL come to the gates looking for food, but make it clear we're starved as-is.

Isn't it something that we even have to consider such action? It's really sad. I can't wait for the day that all of this goes to the point that anyone that even tries is laughed at and ruthlessly mocked as a spineless individual.

The people that usually screech about tolerance are the least tolerant people, that seem to have really racist thoughts while claiming other people (their opposition) see x race as their y statement. Never seen such "tolerant" people say such racist things until someone not like them disagrees with them.

[cs8492]

Dr.Coomer님이 먼저 게시:

chikan님이 먼저 게시:

stop using the same profile picture you have on other wesbites. Don't use the same username and have an "alt" email just for things that could be offensive. Don't have anything leading to you. Make the ADL come to the gates looking for food, but make it clear we're starved as-is.

Isn't it something that we even have to consider such action? It's really sad. I can't wait for the day that all of this goes to the point that anyone that even tries is laughed at and ruthlessly mocked as a spineless individual.

The people that usually screech about tolerance are the least tolerant people, that seem to have really racist thoughts while claiming other people (their opposition) see x race as their y statement. Never seen such "tolerant" people say such racist things until someone not like them disagrees with them.

"We are the tolerant ones, bigot, now accept our way of thinking or starve." That logic totally checks out. The lack of self awareness on fools like that is astounding and frightening at the same time. There is a old saying, "Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers"

[Starbug]

Not worried at all. I don't make racist or antisemitic posts. If those that do end up banned and go on to dispute their bans based upon the sacred altar of "freedom of speech, bruh", I'll find that very amusing.

[endrsgm]

and you don't see any creeping at all of what's allowed and what's not onwards to where more and more things just aren't allowed?
ever stop to think that some of those things should be said? and that eventually just by sitting there and feeling smug at those who got it 'this time' it will eventually either be your turn to 'get it' or you will have to relentlessly self censor?
and thus freedom of speech is gone. and freedom of speech is the basis of all other rights.

queue the natterers who deliberately misunderstand what I wrote and who will start the relentless 'gotcha' game with their defacto 'but this is a private server so no right to free speech exists'. it's so predictable it's sad.

[ezwip]

Digging through my post history and adding me to a spreadsheet to stalk me in more depth is psycho and I don't think they are morally superior to the person they are doing that to.

[Empress Lina]

Satoru님이 먼저 게시:

I just watched youtuber TheQuartering'

This was your first mistake and he trolled you exactly in the way he wanted to

If you want to listen to this POS racist anti-semetic troll garbage nonsense go ahead.

If you're wondering why no one is taking you serioulsy, maybe your 'source' is the problem

EVeryone who disagrees with me =h1tler.

I'm sure you would prefer to watch anita sarkesian then right? Who is one of many reasons western games nowadays suck.

𝐓𝐫𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐥𝐞님이 먼저 게시:

Freedom of speech doesn't apply on private business you know

I'm 100% sure you would say this same exact thing if a company was censoring your left wing idea. Right?

[cs8492]

Starbug님이 먼저 게시:

Not worried at all. I don't make racist or antisemitic posts. If those that do end up banned and go on to dispute their bans based upon the sacred altar of "freedom of speech, bruh", I'll find that very amusing.

The very definition of what is "racist" or "bigoted" changes almost weekly. For ♥♥♥♥ sake's they have gone after people for making the okay sign with their hands. You have no problem letting nutjobs like that dictate what is exceptable then you will eventually find yourself along with the very people that you find "amusing".

After reviewing your post history it's clear that you dismiss any viewpoint that doesn't jive with you worldview as "alt-right", "incel", or other idiotic bad faith, left wing buzzwords. In the end it is not even worth debating with you as you often engage in the very "whataboutisms" and other claptrap that you accuse people that you disagree with of doing.

You are a bad faith actor.

[Empress Lina]

The_Unknown_05님이 먼저 게시:

Kayle x Morgana님이 먼저 게시:

I'm sure you would prefer to watch anita sarkesian then right? Who is one of many reasons western games nowadays suck.

they suck cause of greed, nothing else

No because ♥♥♥♥♥♥ sites like kotaku and rock paper shotgun push for stuff to be forced with "diversity" and "no sexualzation" of woman and hideous looking ones at that.

Games outside of USA are always better. Horizon zero dawn. Neatherlands. Witcher 3(no diversity and even sex scenes) and soon to be cyberpunk 2077. Poland.

What does us get? gears of war 5. lol

Do not forget Sony USA(CALIFORNIA) FORCES DEVS to censor games.

[Aachen]

What does “push for stuff to be forced” mean?

[Empress Lina]

Aachen님이 먼저 게시:

What does “push for things to be forced” mean?

Do you not watch the news? Or read twitter?

[cs8492]

The_Unknown_05님이 먼저 게시:

Kayle x Morgana님이 먼저 게시:

I'm sure you would prefer to watch anita sarkesian then right? Who is one of many reasons western games nowadays suck.

they suck cause of greed, nothing else

They were sold by marketing firms that "social justice" is big bucks. Not realizing that they losing part of their fan base, and the SOCJUS crowd doesn't buy games because of a identitaian plot or character.