Instalar o Steam
Iniciar sessão
|
Idioma
简体中文 (Chinês Simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês Tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol de Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol da América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Brasil)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar problema de tradução
And this is it for KB articles...
https://support.steampowered.com/kb_article.php?ref=7480-WUSF-3601
Some developers also need to control their keys better and either sell into a proper supply chain or vet purchasers instead of chasing bulk orders from randoms over the globe.
This is true, but all grey market keys are in violation of the developers EULA. Why purchase a license and violate the license agreement at the same time? Its counterintuitive, which leads me to believe that people are under the false impression that what they are paying for is just as good/legal/legitimate as what they purchase on Steam's own store.
People are largely aware of the nature of cheap keys but they always take the risk regardless and many developers will always wholesale their keys if the money is right without taking adequate consideration.
Both parties are equally responsible for this problem and both are the ones who get burned at the end of the day.
If developers want safe and secure trading then they should not produce keys and instead distribute their products locked to a platform like Steam or via an API through an authorised retailer.
If X game suddenly has a bulk 10,000 order from Nigeria and then the global keys are being flogged in Switzerland for a beefy profit whilst the payment method is then revoked as stolen, the devs can't really complain.
I understand your position, but it sounds a lot like "The bank vault was unlocked so I took the money"
The bank's (or developer/publisher's in this case) negligence doesn't justify the thief's actions, whether malicious or ignorant.
I wasn't looking to start a debate on this (although I think you've brought up an interesting perspective and I am enjoying the exchange) I was just wondering if there was an official valve statement released regarding the issue. It sounds like it's been left somewhat vague and bundled under the umbrella of "Issues with keys purchased elsewhere are not our issue", which is probably a safe stance to take from a legal standpoint so I understand why it is worded that way.