Installa Steam
Accedi
|
Lingua
简体中文 (cinese semplificato)
繁體中文 (cinese tradizionale)
日本語 (giapponese)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandese)
Български (bulgaro)
Čeština (ceco)
Dansk (danese)
Deutsch (tedesco)
English (inglese)
Español - España (spagnolo - Spagna)
Español - Latinoamérica (spagnolo dell'America Latina)
Ελληνικά (greco)
Français (francese)
Indonesiano
Magyar (ungherese)
Nederlands (olandese)
Norsk (norvegese)
Polski (polacco)
Português (portoghese - Portogallo)
Português - Brasil (portoghese brasiliano)
Română (rumeno)
Русский (russo)
Suomi (finlandese)
Svenska (svedese)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraino)
Segnala un problema nella traduzione
Questa discussione è stata chiusa 
Regole e linee guida per le discussioni
Segnala questo messaggio
https://steamcommunity.com/app/264710/discussions/0/1796278072841772214/
https://steamcommunity.com/app/292030/discussions/0/1795152172934644126/
https://steamcommunity.com/discussions/forum/7/154642447919614716/
And Valve doesn't ever seem to release statistics
First link is practically a study on "My preferred game deserves better, it must be rigged".
https://web.archive.org/web/20190224174705/https://store.steampowered.com/stats/
21,336 24,709 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
7,868 7,868 Subnautica
The "generic fantasy setting" had almost 3 times as many players when that post was made.
None of them are in the GOTY category. Also, like I told you, all of those three have positive recent reviews. Btw, your claim was "every categories have at least one mixed game" and as far as I know, there's more than 3 categories. So yeah, blatant lies.
Well, coming from you, it's not really surprising.
It's always the same. They nominate some obscure game and it's not on the list so that means every game must have paid to be on the list.
You hear this every year they have had this type of award.
You are once again blatantly lying.
Also I'm seeing a lot of complaining about what is in the lists (with no real reasoning behind why they don't qualify or you can't see how they got nominated) and nothing from you on what you think they replaced?
Do remember the 2019 restriction actually rules out a lot of games, add to that you need to win the popular nomination vote against hundreds of other games so games with a dedicated fan-base are more likely to win (due to the fans voting for them) as opposed to necessarily the best games (which might have more fragmented voting) and you can easily see how you end up with the list that we have.
So, if enough people like a thing enough to nominate it in sufficient numbers, friends and alts and all, and does so in greater numbers than any other game does, then it gets in.
Take it from me. I have very little opinion on these games and I hadn't even heard of some of them before this vote. And all I did was register a series of mainly protest votes, such as voting for games that are 2D or otherwise show non-full-3D graphics, or have something that just happens to pander to my tastes (e.g. the zoo), while also snubbing games that other people had asked me to vote for because I feel they're too popular. This is all because I really don't know most of these games and otherwise don't even have an opinion on them.
I don't give a hoot about this and you probably shouldn't either.
They did.. by polling the audience and counting the highest responses as the most meaningful. Can you think of a better way that doesn't fall into the same Agenda driven Tarpits as the Oscars, Music awards, etc?
The best games are those that can grab and hold on to dedicated fanbases.
As opposed to 'flash in the pan' games. The 2019 thing was actually a restriction added based on user complaints because many opeople thought it wasn't 'fair' that a game would have to compete against the likes of Witcher 3, or Skyrim.
Gets the popcorn*
Proceed.
That's the sort of shady dealings that risks disgusting your own employees and them leaking the info. And bad rep like that sticks on you for a LONG time.
Most of valve's failings are to do with their own arrogance to admit faults, disconnection to the actual needs of their fans and customers, failing to do anything of note with their time and money, no clear direction as to where they are headed, too easily scared by outrage which forces them to go against previous promises (banning games and manipulating reviews) and a general feeling of incompetence that is probably the result of talent getting sick of creating cosmetics leaving the company.
And as for greed so far they seem to have restrained themselves to exploiting their own titles more or less and the steam market is at least transparent as to what people are doing.
The worst example so far for Valve's greediness is Artifact and again that is their own title.
I would sooner believe that any manipulation of the GOTY awards is a result in trying to become "respectable". Like how in the previous awards people could chose any game regardless of release date or genre and while that sort of thing is wonderful for getting general feedback as to what people truly like and is a has a great sense of freedom. Valve probably would have wanted the awards to appear more professional and stick to the year part of the game of the year title.
Like quality control, the reasons for nominations are subjective. Who would have thought that, eh?
GTAV as a labour of love. Well considering if they didn't have the 2019 release limit it would probably wind up in the GOTY vategory again...its not suprising. People enjoy the game. Many people who are very happy to say as much. Not me of course I've honestyly never gotten into the GTA series.
One day i will figure out why its easier to believe some unprovable conspiracy than the more mundane idea that, other people just like the game.
It's the funniest part of conspiracy theories. They're not bound to reason.
There you have one. Neither the former threrad or the actual one are meant for discussion, they're just tinfoilhattery that's bound to make people angry if left running for long around. So instead of waiting for this to blow up and since there's no basis on the premise, to avoid having to issue warnings or bans because people got too riled up discussing a vapid subject we lock it.
And to answer your OP. No, they're not and it'd be stupid for them to do so.
If You don't believe the nominations why would you believe the voting data from the same source? We'd just be discussing how the data is rigged instead of the results.
See how this is a rabbit hole without any valid course or conclussion?
That's why these topics get locked.