安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
此主題已被鎖定 
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
Sure. Let's forget TW3, Stardew Valley, VA-11 Hall-A, Hollow Knight, Cuphead, STEINS;GATES, The Forest, Payday, Dark Souls 3, FF7 and many others...
Again, what you don't like =/= what everyone dislike. The world doesn't revolve around you.
I would add that as well.
https://store.playstation.com/en-us/product/UP0006-CUSA05364_00-ANTHEM1000000000
https://store.playstation.com/en-us/product/UP4008-CUSA15611_00-BEESIEA000000000
I have alot more fun playing
This is the Police
or
Gladiator School
or
Winklejte
All games that your Playstation 4 would likely curate out of existence!!!
Again your taste's don't match up with everyone's as many of us like games from Indy developers who are still trying to make a great game even if they don't have much money to do it!
RimWorld
and
BattleBrothers
Are perfect examples of 5 star games what wouldn't exist in your world...
Oh, sure. The "taste" of literally illegal gambling addiction and/or porn shouldn't be allowed. Don't see how that's even up for debate.
This is how Steam used to do it, and it worked better. This is how consoles still do it, and they make up 90% of sales.
Indeed, a failure of the system, I'll assume similar to my good faith pre-order, but it never should have happened. But you guys going out of your way to pick out one-off specific bad games goes back to the exception vs rule thing. Its not "every game is bad rats" on the PS4 store, even if there are some bad rats that slip through. Which somebody should be held accountable for.
Was your point that all of those games are indeed terrible? Because all of those games are indeed terrible. Except maybe FF7, which is a PS1 game, that I hear is a terrible port, so still terrible.
It wouldn't curate them out of existence, they would simply have to exist on their own merit, instead of a free ride on the Steam store. Factorio, for example, sold 100,000 copies before it released here.
At this point, you're either a troll or really beyond any help. Terrible games, yeah, sure.
I surely thank God that you're not the one who curates a store. I would give up on gaming.
You realize there are literally tons of VNs that aren't porn right? And even of the ones that have "nsfw" content, many of them are censored to be the same version that consoles see. Playstation has a ton of all-ages VNs.
As pointed out earlier it didn't work. Steam had a ton of crap no one would willingly buy. Some of the worst rated titles on Steam to date released before greenlight even happened.
Also consoles suck at it:
https://store.playstation.com/en-us/product/UP5682-CUSA17665_00-HRRSTRS301CNSLPS
https://store.playstation.com/en-us/product/UP4008-CUSA15611_00-BEESIEA000000000
https://store.playstation.com/en-us/product/UP9000-CUSA00068_00-KNACK00000000000
https://store.playstation.com/en-us/product/UP3995-CUSA09591_00-LTRUCKTYCOON2PS4
Yeah that's where you should learn a concept called personal responsibility. It's your money, you're at fault if you buy something that isn't good. Unless the marketing was outright false or the product literally defective (bad isn't the same as defective) it's your own damn fault.
"I can't imagine anyone having a different point of view than my own. Even though various games have millions of sales and people that happily enjoy them, if I dislike them they are crap and don't belong on Steam."
Did you have helicopter parents as a child or something? I don't get how someone can be so self-absorbed.
Steam store isn't a free ride. It's survival of the fittest. Having a low barrier to entry means everyone has to actually put work forth. Whereas back in the "golden days" when a crappy indie hit steam it made massive bank because the PC platform was starved for content.
Though, neither of them is on that 2019 list, because they're just not popular enough. So much for popularity being a metric for quality. :P
(The other two either didn't let me rebind keyboard keys or wasn't fun anymore after several levels.)
No, it shouldn't because I'm still dependent on Steam servers to get permission to play some of my games, because of @#$%ing DRM.
No, hopefully GOG destroys them all.
The problem with YouTube is that it became too big to fail, as opposed to being one of at least several major video sites. It's a different problem.
You do realize that (1) it takes time for something to be considered notable enough and commended enough by other sources (due to Wikipedia's "no original research" rule) to get onto that list, and (2) you're still basically appealing to a popularity contest, right?
Check your local park for nature trails.
No, I'm serious; it's really gratifying to learn about local flora and fauna. I've been doing that lately myself. Also you basically get to play Pokémon-collecting but with real life.
I dunno about you but a good darn lot of visual novels are known for their storylines. Some of them also can contain porn (particularly if you get the patch for that), but some don't.
Then there's a bunch of less noteworthy stuff. But that's like, for every genre.
Probably not, but I'm not giving it any of my money.
Also, it ain't always a scam. But I do prefer buying finished products...unless I happen to think they're worth more than just a game and worth investing in, like a Kickstarter project. And those cases are rare.
I'm pretty sure some of the indie games I've played and enjoyed wouldn't be on Steam if Valve had tried to curate things manually. Both because they have different tastes than me and because they'd be drowning in submissions.
Valve has been trying to gradually either automate or let the community decide on stuff, rather than having a hand in it. (Ironically, the exception is the Steam client, which they horribly mangled right in time for Halloween.)
I don't know why you'd blindly buy games on Steam just because they're on Steam; that would be like blindly buying stuff in a bookstore and expecting to like it.
Besides, since games DO get incredibly cheap, if I don't know what it is, I simply wait until it's cheap enough (to my liking) before buying it.
I've commented before that Steam should have a minimum word count for reviews, which would at the very least somewhat impede meme reviews.
I support this idea, as well as the flipside of making it possible to leave a review without picking either an upvote or downvote.
1. Eww, free-to-play. Free-to-play games often have microtransactions. Screw that crap. I'd rather just pay once for the game and then have it in complete form.
2. If you think that VNs "have little-to-no value", then I guess you don't like bookstores.
3. Try to find me when Phoenix Wright or Steins;Gate or fault milestone one or The Fruit of Grisaia "used to be free". (Piracy does not count.) Or, for that matter, were on Flash. (Fangames don't count.) (Protip: a lot of visual novels use the Ren'py engine. Flash is rarely ever used, except for amateur projects. You may want to actually learn about the object of your criticism before being so sure of yourself.)
Nah, Epic's CEO is a jerkwad.
Instead, Epic should go DRM-free. And so should Steam.
N.B. "suck" is not an objective assessment but is based on one's tastes.
You may be interested to know that, according to your profile, you've spent 189 hours playing a game I don't see any reason for me to play.
Seems to work pretty well for consoles https://www.reddit.com/r/Fallout/comments/4ofqrz/♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥/
Then those ones don't need to be taken down? Though arguably the entire genre fails a quality check, as un-animated, un-voiced doodles behind textboxes doesn't qualify as a game. But whatever if people wanna buy non-porn books, I'm fine enough with that. Just like I have little interest in sports games, but its fine if people want to buy them.
How many times are you going to fail to make this same bad rats point?
How is a bad game not defective? You brought up Ark, so you're probably a hater against that, so lets use that as an example in my favor. The doors in Ark are buggy as hell. They fail to open, they can randomly unlock, they can fail to let you walk through them because of lag, and probably other issues. Is that not defective? If I bought a door in real life, and it was that broken, I would certainly return it, so how do bad video games not fail the same defective check?
Oh I can understand it, the problem is that people with different "opinions" than me are just objectively wrong, and therefore irrelevant. For example, one of the reasons I pre-ordered FO76 was to play with my fiance. She had never played a FO game before, and couldn't understand why everyone hated it so much. Then I got her FO4 and it blew her mind what a piece of scam trash FO76 was. That's you, about every other game, apparently.
It absolutely is. Releasing on the Steam store returns a guaranteed profit on a potentially free investment. Which is why everyone is trying to intentionally make the lowest quality product they possibly can nowadays. Throw in some meme or some hentai and those freebie sales go up by probably 10,000%
Fortunately, Atelier released five games so I nominated a couple of them instead.
Don't worry; you're not the only one who basically wonderposted a nomination list. I did too.
low quality isn't the same as defective
You buy low quality cheese, its kinda oily, salty, and doesn't melt well... you can still use it as "cheese" and it's still edible... it's just not good. Defective would be like something renders it inedible.
On top of looking up quality and defective in the dictionary you might as well add objectively to the pile and look up the word "opinion" for good measure.
False which is precisely why some indies bawl their eyes out on twitter and their games "journalist" friends rant that steam needs gatekeeping.
Sure, lets play.
Defective:
- imperfect or faulty.
- lacking or deficient.
That's 99% of Early Access games, and 90% of indie games. Ark's inability to walk through a door sure sounds "imperfect or faulty". Unanimated unvoiced text boxes as a way to deliver a story is certainly "lacking or deficient", unless its a port of some decades old PS1 game, when that was about the extent of technology. Hell, even those were usually animated, and when they port them they often add voice acting. MGS1 was even voice acted way back when.