Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Badge rank 2: Salien level 6
Badge rank 3: Salien level 9 (7 hours with a script, probably about 10 manually)
Badge rank 4: Salien level 12 (nobody has done this yet)
Highest is rank 6.
That'll take some time if you don't use any macros or browser console commands.
The game is still finicky for me.
We still get cards for playing the game though (3 per day).
Rank 3 isn't even 200xp, it's 100. Yeah, I know, there's no way that's worth it. Unless you just really, really like the look of the badge, I guess.
So uh, Ms. Beak....normally I don't state the obvious, but I think you have a problem. Two THOUSAND games? Level 200? Do you have a life outside Steam? You people are so ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ weird.
Hobbies take time and money.
Have you ever heard of game bundles? That's how you accumulate large numbers of games over a number of years.
I am not sure how any of this is pertinent to the discussion.
It's pertinent to any discussion where these smug elitist types show up just to get attention. They have nothing else going on for them so they spend money in a giant ♥♥♥♥-waving competition of who has the highest worthless level on Steam. I actively avoid people like that and cringe whenever I have the misfortune to see them.
Step two: Necro said thread for the sole purpose of mentioning someone's Steam level and number of games they have and making assumptions about their life based on the information you actively sought out, unprompted by the actual conversation that had taken place in the thread.
Step three: Claim the person you decided to single out and mention was looking for attention, while simultaneously claiming to avoid people like that individual.
Step four: Come to the realisation there's something wrong with all of the above. Hopefully. But we know that won't happen.
But just in case, step five: Profit.
Ms Beak made a non boasting post that was on topic, but you went out of your way to view their profile and then feel the need to attack them? Someone has a problem, and it isn't Ms Beak.
If you actively avoid people like that - why this post?