Lewd mods?

[AH_Evangylene]

So I remember a good while back Steam changed their policy on censorship and allowed more adult games onto the platform. While this has lead to good results like Mirror there are also lots of very low quality ones too. Now I will admit I have not read the policy change word for word. But would this also apply to mods?

If it currently does not then why? It is clear that the change in what games are allowed didn't destroy Steam so if they same happened for mods then I doubt it would cause a problem either. Personally I am all for more freedoms on the platform. It allows for more expression to take place and will open up areas for more discussion like I am trying to do here.

However if this does already apply to mods then my post is meaningless in which case...then well...crap.

[8ullfrog]

Eh, those mods already exist, but some publishers would probably get cranky about it.

I did get a laugh when some guy was complaining about a game called "sexual nudity" though. Screenshots were pretty funny. Some tatted up poser figure laying in front of a soda machine covered in cans.

Funny what some people find sexy.

[AH_Evangylene]

Nguyên văn bởi 8ullfrog:

Eh, those mods already exist, but some publishers would probably get cranky about it.

I did get a laugh when some guy was complaining about a game called "sexual nudity" though. Screenshots were pretty funny. Some tatted up poser figure laying in front of a soda machine covered in cans.

Funny what some people find sexy.

Yes they do and they have websites made for them. But instead of needing those why not just allow them on Steam? Give options for those who not interested in them to not even see them(since I know there are kids on Steam).

[8ullfrog]

I just said why? Some publishers would be mad as hell. I mean I doubt there are any gone home lewd mods, but I don't think the developer would support that.


I do remember my buddy craigsters being significantly upset after installing a nude mod for skyrim, the percentage of dongers was not to his liking.

[AH_Evangylene]

Nguyên văn bởi 8ullfrog:

I just said why? Some publishers would be mad as hell. I mean I doubt there are any gone home lewd mods, but I don't think the developer would support that.


I do remember my buddy craigsters being significantly upset after installing a nude mod for skyrim, the percentage of dongers was not to his liking.

Are you talking about the mod makers, game devs or website owners? I also just don't understand why they would be mad?...

[8ullfrog]

Well lets say you make a deep, introspective game. And then someone slaps a dong on the forehead of all your characters. Would you enjoy that?

[AH_Evangylene]

Nguyên văn bởi 8ullfrog:

Well lets say you make a deep, introspective game. And then someone slaps a dong on the forehead of all your characters. Would you enjoy that?

1. I would be fine with that. Why would I care what others want to do in a singleplayer game? If we was talking about something like CS:GO or Rainbow Six Siege then yes it would be an issue.

2. These mods already exist so how does that apply at all to not allowing it on Steam Workshop?

3. I am sure game devs would be much more concerned about the balance of the game then graphics/animations if they even cared since they made the game to get your money and since you will have already bought(or someone else for you)the game then they wouldn't care.

The dev of Stardew Valley doesn't like the adult mods that exist for it. He isn't saying he will try prevent them though. What the devs or Skyrim, Starbound, <Insert game with Steam Workshop> intended for the game to be is not my concern. Just cause there is a mainstory in Skyrim and Starbound that the devs intended for you to go through does not mean I will go through that cause I have the freedom to choose what I do.

[Joker]

I smell a meme in the making here.

[ksn0va]

Nguyên văn bởi 8ullfrog:

Well lets say you make a deep, introspective game. And then someone slaps a dong on the forehead of all your characters. Would you enjoy that?

Are the dongs a mandatory patch that you have to download? If not, then I don't see a problem in what people do on their own time.

[8ullfrog]

look, if we're voting, I say go for it. I'm just typing that some devs might frown on such shenanigans. I particularly like how call me kev brutally abuses games.