Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The game is Tales of Arise btw,and I have a 120hz monitor,but I usually keep the refresh rate at 60 in most games.
But if you can't see a difference, turn scaling off.
You can try setting your game to windowed and LS to "Custom"-scaling mode, with "Resize before scaling" enabled. Increasing your scaling factor should increase performance. Set scaling type to LS1.
It's ok,i will just wait for a future update.Thanks for the help
You don't do X4 upscaling and expect a crisp image result.
They really should make a dummy proof guide because we keep seeing the same questions being asked again and again.
First you can use frame gen or upscaling either seperatly or running together.
Second for best upscaling results in 3D games either use LS1 or FSR with a sharpness of 1-3 and an X2 resolution upscale.
This means upscaling from 1080P to 1440P, 1440P to 4K, 4K to 8K and so on.
For the frame generation part 9/10 a simple X2 (60->120fps ex.) will give you the best results and least artifacts. X3 and X4 is mostly used if you already have a high FPS (like +100) and have a high refresh rate monitor.
If you have a low baseline FPS combined with frame drops you will have a bad experience in general with framegen.
Yeah it is basically super cheap supersampling.. I love it. Use it all the time if I don't need performance headroom because it looks gorg.