Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Yes. As you already noticed a 60 x2 simply looks better than 40 x3.
Just to be clear, by base framerate are you meaning the FPS which the game would normally run at without the frame generation? Or the FPS that it's capped to? If the former, my games run pretty consistently at 100 to 120 fps with some exceptions - like a few of the newer AAA titles. So if that's the case low base-framerate shouldn't be an issue for me.
Someone might ask why I'm even using x3 if I don't need it. I'm mainly using it for the games that have cutscenes that are locked at 30fps, or emulators, etc. It's pretty stunning in that regard.
By base-framerate i mean the framerate you cap your game to prior to feeding it to LSFG.
*So 60 for x2@120 or 40 for x3@120
bad update