Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Though that said, you might have latency from starting with 40 FPS rather than 60, but it's not really Lossless Scaling's fault.
Anyway, there's nothing stopping you from using frame gen from a lower base framerate; a lot of people even use 4x on 24 FPS content, it's just it may lead to image quality issues with the intermediate frames.
Give it a try, depending on the game or media it may not be so bad.
40FPS base is really tough to deal with. Higher input lag and lower image quality compared to 60FPS. x3 and x4 are really useful to get from 60 to 180 and 240 from 60.
It depends on the game how useful x3 and x4 is with low input fps and on personal taste, I have a 165hz monitor and never use x2. I play Ultimate General with a 25fps cap x4 and it looks good. Also I'm happy with 30x4 in MSFS. and CP2077 at 40x4. For third-person games like RDR2 or Witcher 3 I prefer 53x3.