Is the framegen better than the amd?

[Mezray]

I have a 7900 xt just wanting to know if people tried already before buying it

[Gassy_Gecko]

Yes alot less input delay and with amd especially on rtx cards you have to run fsr which scales you down where with this you can run native frame gen

[kripcision]

from what i hear people tend to like LS frame gen better, i cant use fsr3 so i cant compare, one user was combining both fsr3 and lsfg lol, i cant imagine using both would be ideal tho but i would totally try it, for the science.

[Ifosil]

No, FSR 3 is better :) LSFG comes close but tendens to artifact schimmering on screenedges. But since the last patch it is much better. But i am a little bit worried about power consumtion.

Seems like LSFG nearly double my Watt needed, i hope its only a measure error.

[ogioto]

Originally posted by Ifosil:

No, FSR 3 is better :) LSFG comes close but tendens to artifact schimmering on screenedges. But since the last patch it is much better. But i am a little bit worried about power consumtion.

Seems like LSFG nearly double my Watt needed, i hope its only a measure error.

I think the OP meant AFMF, not FSR3 ;)

[Xavvy]

Originally posted by ogioto:

Originally posted by Ifosil:

No, FSR 3 is better :) LSFG comes close but tendens to artifact schimmering on screenedges. But since the last patch it is much better. But i am a little bit worried about power consumtion.

Seems like LSFG nearly double my Watt needed, i hope its only a measure error.

I think the OP meant AFMF, not FSR3 ;)

Yes.. as someone with many powerful gaming/dev rigs(my job).. I've tested this on both RTX 4090, 7900xtx and everything down the line to a laptop 1070 lol.. I've used AFMF extensively and I've literally stopped using it. Everything about lossless scaling is just better.. LS1 > NiS > FSR1.. when it comes to frame gen by a fairly large margin I would say LSFG.. especially 2.0 is just better than AFMF..

I would say that AFMF being proprietary to the card gives it an advantage of being more efficient but it works far worse than LSFG 2.0. I would say that AFMF is comparable to LSFG1 before the 1.1 update.. now it's actually worse than LSFG 1.1 lol.. I also find AFMF to be more unstable than LSFG.. I've had AFMF cause a lot of crashes in older games, etc. As far as hardware based frame gen.. I would say FSR3 is a bit better on an actual AMD card but not so much on a older GPU or non AMD card.

I mean it's supposed to work the same on everything across the board but it doesn't seem to. DLSS3 FG is by far the best but I mean it should be since it's a specific damned AI optical core for it.. sooo.. yeah. Pretty much goes DLSS3 FG > FSR3(AMD Card) > FSR3(non AMD Card) = / > LSFG 2.0(like LSFG 2.0 properly setup is surprisingly close to non AMD FSR3) > LSFG 1.0 > AFMF(lol) .. it is what it is.. honestly I think AMD could of made AFMF better. I mean it is getting better slowly but at this point it's just TV AI frame gen with less latency lol.

I think they will be pressure by Xbox/Playstation to improve it a lot for console sales tbh.