JK ROWLING

[51^147]

She Rowling in money with this game being top seller right now , what happened to not supporting her after what she pulled? Funny internet people they forget to quick

[welly321]

I am buying this game because I want to support JK Rowling. She is a wonderful author and an incredible person.

[Dragon Master]

Killance님이 먼저 게시:

_galaxy님이 먼저 게시:

False. TERF: trans exclusionary radical feminist. It means you exclude certain trans people has nothing to do with homophobia or transphobia.

Tell that to her on Twitter. She literally calls herself that and celebrates it. She has a loooot of anti-gay rhetoric on her twitter and blogs.

She started calling herself that as a way to troll her haters. lol. They're the ones who labeled her first because she said there is a difference between transwomen and biological women. That is literally all she said to be labeled as such and because she has F-U money she doesn't have to care about her haters and started using the label they gave her as a way to make them seethe.

[zen]

51^147님이 먼저 게시:

She Rowling in money with this game being top seller right now , what happened to not supporting her after she pulled? Funny internet people they forget to quick

It's not that we forgot too quick, we just don't care, pal.

Do you honestly think I'm going to stop getting a game based on what I was raised on as a kid, you're totally delusional.

'Oh no, J K Rowling said a few negative comments about transgenders, It's made me feel targeted and angry, even though it absolutely has nothing to do with you anyway because you most likely aren't transgender in the first place, just here to make yourself look a moron, which you've succeeded at....................................... Congratulations!

[Tali'Zorah]

only a few very loud ppl wanted the boycott. Majority of ppl simply don't care about their ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥. I agree with jkr <3

[Killance]

zenFX님이 먼저 게시:

51^147님이 먼저 게시:

She Rowling in money with this game being top seller right now , what happened to not supporting her after she pulled? Funny internet people they forget to quick

It's not that we forgot too quick, we just don't care, pal.

Do you honestly think I'm going to stop getting a game based on what I was raised on as a kid, you're totally delusional.

'Oh no, J K Rowling said a few negative comments about transgenders, It's made me feel targeted and angry, even though it absolutely has nothing to do with you anyway because you most likely aren't transgender in the first place, just here to make yourself look a moron, which you've succeeded at....................................... Congratulations!

^ pretty much.

Harry Potter itself has done nothing wrong. It's a good story with a great world. The author proved to be atrocious towards others, but what does that have to do with Harry Potter itself? Authors aren't the story.

What are we going to stop enjoying love craft horror because the author of them was a notorious racist? It's pretty stupid.

[XartaX]

Killance님이 먼저 게시:

^ pretty much.

Harry Potter itself has done nothing wrong. It's a good story with a great world. The author proved to be atrocious towards others, but what does that have to do with Harry Potter itself? Authors aren't the story.

What are we going to stop enjoying love craft horror because the author of them was a notorious racist? It's pretty stupid.

Nah, the only issue with JKR is that she's a feminist. And that she pandered to the loons for a while. But otherwise she's based.

[Dwarf Floyd]

Killance님이 먼저 게시:

_galaxy님이 먼저 게시:

False. TERF: trans exclusionary radical feminist. It means you exclude certain trans people has nothing to do with homophobia or transphobia.

Tell that to her on Twitter. She literally calls herself that and celebrates it. She has a loooot of anti-gay rhetoric on her twitter and blogs.

I bet she hasn't! Because what people like you call anti Trans and anti gay is in reality not anti Trans and anti gay! You just do it to discredit people who just have even a small difference in your opinion. I see this since many years. Especially in the woke bubble. So in short, I don't believe your accusations.

[Killance]

zenFX님이 먼저 게시:

51^147님이 먼저 게시:

She Rowling in money with this game being top seller right now , what happened to not supporting her after she pulled? Funny internet people they forget to quick

It's not that we forgot too quick, we just don't care, pal.

Do you honestly think I'm going to stop getting a game based on what I was raised on as a kid, you're totally delusional.

'Oh no, J K Rowling said a few negative comments about transgenders, It's made me feel targeted and angry, even though it absolutely has nothing to do with you anyway because you most likely aren't transgender in the first place, just here to make yourself look a moron, which you've succeeded at....................................... Congratulations!

Dragon Master님이 먼저 게시:

Killance님이 먼저 게시:

Tell that to her on Twitter. She literally calls herself that and celebrates it. She has a loooot of anti-gay rhetoric on her twitter and blogs.

She started calling herself that as a way to troll her haters. lol. They're the ones who labeled her first because she said there is a difference between transwomen and biological women. That is literally all she said to be labeled as such and because she has F-U money she doesn't have to care about her haters and started using the label they gave her as a way to make them seethe.

Or she, like many others, went masks off since Elon supports massive racism and homophobic remarks. He's still salty his last wife dumped him for a trans person lol. She isn't stupid, but she's definitely ignorant based on the who "Hermione is black" thing. Calling everyone racist for not agreeing was a pretty real thing and not a troll.

But as I keep saying what does that have to do with the Harry Potter world? The author just makes the story. This game, along with many media about Harry Potter, has next to nothing to do with her. At this point she just collects the royalty from the series as she just sits in relaxation.

[Killance]

Sir Lance alot님이 먼저 게시:

Killance님이 먼저 게시:

Tell that to her on Twitter. She literally calls herself that and celebrates it. She has a loooot of anti-gay rhetoric on her twitter and blogs.

I bet she hasn't! Because what people like you call anti Trans and anti gay is in reality not anti Trans and anti gay! You just do it to discredit people who just have even a small difference in your opinion. I see this since many years. Especially in the woke bubble. So in short, I don't believe your accusations.

It's all on her twitter page lol. See yourself on her post history. Can't exactly call it "accusations" when she herself says it with Twitter documentation.

[Axion]

Who cares. It's a video game. The devs had nothing to do with any of the comments and besides. Her views are her own. The world has gone woke.

[SaltyWeasel]

Seems to me a certain group of individuals is phobic to anyone that does not share the same views as them.

[Killance]

Dragon Master님이 먼저 게시:

Killance님이 먼저 게시:

It's all on her twitter page lol. See yourself on her post history. Can't exactly call it "accusations" when she herself says it with Twitter documentation.

You mean her extensive twitter history where she actively supports trans and gay people but also actively says that there is a clear and distinct biological difference between men and women and that individuals who commit crimes who happen to be trans should not be treated as the "identity" they want, such as a graper with a d being treated as a lesbian and being sent to a woman's prison, right?

https://www.glamour.com/story/a-complete-breakdown-of-the-jk-rowling-transgender-comments-controversy/amp

Here you go. Good breakdown on everything recently.

Like I keep saying she pretty much has nothing to do with the game. Even the series is almost completely untouched by her now. Everyone else writes the stories for Harry Potter.

This whole "boycott" is stupid because people want to do it uninformed about who's really making the Harry Potter Canon now.

Edit: LOL YOU DELETED YOUR COMMENT!

[welly321]

Sir Lance alot님이 먼저 게시:

Killance님이 먼저 게시:

Tell that to her on Twitter. She literally calls herself that and celebrates it. She has a loooot of anti-gay rhetoric on her twitter and blogs.

I bet she hasn't! Because what people like you call anti Trans and anti gay is in reality not anti Trans and anti gay! You just do it to discredit people who just have even a small difference in your opinion. I see this since many years. Especially in the woke bubble. So in short, I don't believe your accusations.

Its not worth arguing with the wokesters. If you don't believe their exact position, and that position changes monthly, then you are a bigot/racist/transphobe/terf/etc.... The tide has turned and people have seen the ridiculousness of the wokesters.

[Israly]

i dont get the issue.... if rowling hates trans people or whatever...she is in her right to do so, we live in a world where we are allowed to like and dislike different things, we shouldnt be forced to like or respect something we dont feel; like, if i see a guy with beard im gonna call him"he" because its what the observable evidence shows, im not gonna ask the guy what he perceives himself as.
Some people think the world is made of rainbows, and it doesnt work that way. Today´s society is made of crystal, no joke, everyone has a reason to be offended lol.
Also this might sound awful to some but imagine i would hate trans or black people hypothetically or whatever, whats the problem? who is anyone to tell me what im allowed to hate or not. Because you cant force people to think as you do, and when you try to do so you start to get too close to the worst regimes of humanity (Totalitarianism).

[welly321]

Israly님이 먼저 게시:

i dont get the issue.... if rowling hates trans people or whatever...she is in her right to do so, we live in a world where we are allowed to like and dislike different things, we shouldnt be forced to like or respect something we dont feel; like, if i see a guy with beard im gonna call him"he" because its what the observable evidence shows, im not gonna ask the guy what he perceives himself as.
Some people think the world is made of rainbows, and it doesnt work that way. Today´s society is made of crystal, no joke, everyone has a reason to be offended lol.
Also this might sound awful to some but imagine i would hate trans or black people hypothetically or whatever, whats the problem? who is anyone to tell me what im allowed to hate or not. Because you cant force people to think as you do, and when you try to do so you start to get too close to the worst regimes of humanity (Totalitarianism).

The wokesters disagree. They think they can force people to accept trans through the threat of "Canceling" you if you don't agree. They also believe in censoring and any other type of nonsense in order to stop "Hate" from spreading. This is not an exagerration. These people actually think if you don't agree with them on Trans or any other issue, you don't deserve to live in the USA.