Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Yeah, the Spell seems a little bit op in my opinion, i hope there is consequences for using dark magic, i also hope there is some good and powerfull non deadly spells
In the movies (don't know for the books), we don't know if you can use protect spells to avoid a Avada Kedavra, but since it's the game, i think this spell wouldn't one shot player or player would be able to parry it
That being said, if I understood it right, the Dark Arts Battle Arena automatically gives you access to the dark curses just to practice with. You can't actually use them outside of the arena until you've actually gained access to the curses in the game normally, and you will also have to put points into talents before you're able to use them efficiently too, so don't expect to be able to floor everything early in the game.
I read only to the third book, but on the movies, Dumbledore was the only who barely managed to block Voldemort. Harry did it in the 4th movie only because Voldemort wasn't using his own wand, I suppose.
And about those consequences, Idk about that. That would go against the lore.
That's interesting. So a knight shield - or maybe a book - would defend a wizard from Avada Kedavra lol
He did it because Harry's wand was made with a feather from the same Phoenix as Voldemort. In this one instance, the wands can't actually kill the holder of the other wand, or something like that.
https://harrypotter.fandom.com/wiki/Subtle_laws_of_wands#Wand_relation
No, because the Dark Wizard will simply target a part of you that is not protected by the shield/book. And that is assuming the Curse doesn't spread from things it hits to people holding them (which might perfectly well be the case, like in D&D when you can't just use a shield to "block" a Finger of Death spell). In fact, I would assume the Curse only requires line of sight + line of effect to you, and nothing you hold in your hands or wear on your body will affect its effectiveness. Otherwise protecting from it would be as easy as donning a suit of full plate armour with sunglasses.
The obvious counter to Unforgivable Curses isn't a particular spell trick or anything, it is the fact that these spells are forbidden to use in any circumstances under threat of Azkaban detention for life.
So yeah, killing someone with a Death Curse might in fact be as easy as wishing it very much. However, dealing with the fallout of your action would be much more difficult. Like in real life, killing a person might be as easy as taking a knife and sticking it into their neck, but few people actually do it due to the dire consequences this entails for the hapless murderer.
Thus, the difficulty spike would come not when using the Curse on the initial target, but when facing squads of high-level Aurors sent to snuff out the "Dark Wizard on campus".
Like, for example, in the Dark Arts trailer there is a teacher who finds out you were using Unforgivable Curses ("What have you done!..."). Normally, you would then have to kill him, and make sure you don't get caught for the murder. But at least one other student already knows (your Slytherin partner), so you might have to kill him too, or enter into an uneasy alliance hoping he doesn't break and rat you out. Of course, the sudden death of a teacher would cause a ruckus, and if the Dark Arts cave is found, the school will know that some student(s) have learned, and used, Unforgivable Curses. Which would put you in a bind, to say the least. Maybe you'll miss using regular combat spells at that point...
To use the Death Curse all you need is to wholeheartedly wish the other person dead. Which is easy to imagine when dealing with perceived "enemies of mankind" like (other) Dark Wizards. But yeah, it's a bit different from the regular butterflies and rainbows, so I guess it might count as a "dark route".
I don't think Voldemort or any of the Death Eaters in the books were constrained by this sort of condition.
I think it makes much more sense to have an "evil alignment" score instead which shows your disregard for human life and willingness to use any means to achieve your goals, which would allow you to use the Death Curse effectively. This score would be affected by your actions in the world, like Renegade in Mass Effect, Dark Side in KOTOR and Evil alignments in D&D CRPGs.