Why female roles cannot have trousers-looking in suit?

[mered1th]

Apparently, all the female role users must have found out that most lookings for female roles basically are all long dress.
Well...not to be feminist or something, can officials mention this situation? Female long dress design is a little bit weird, why can't you just give all the players a chosen version of deciding dress in trousers or dress or something else?
Please optimize it, thanks a lot.

[mered1th]

Originally posted by Feroxxy:

Maybe play the game longer than 10 minutes and you'll find that there is a whole big collection of different looking clothing (and you can also transmog your gear to look like other gear).

I played it for 20+ hours, I definitely knew what you want to tell...Just simply express that most suit are based in dress-looking, just wonder why can't we choose whether we want dress or trousers looking in the whole designing process?

[mered1th]

Originally posted by Moga CMDR:

mine has been wearing pants the whole game.

Me too, my fav one is the dark wizard suit lol

[mered1th]

Originally posted by boytype:

With the amount of effort they went to in avoiding every trace of choosing a gender during character creation, it is suspicious that they lock you into only having access to 50% of the outfit cosmetics, based on your characters identified gender.

No pronouns, "Body1" and "Body2", "voice1" and "voice2", choosing which "bathroom" you use instead of a gender, but 100% locked in gender identified clothing lol

Yeah!! That's exactly what I wanna say!!! It's really suspicious and ironic tho

[mered1th]

Originally posted by godivalocks:

I finally got a drop that was pants that were decent (the riding outfit), and VERY happily put them on my character and it took me many hours into the game before I got those. I loathed having my character put into ugly, impractical skirts.

Yeah, for those who not purchase the deluxe version, it still need some time to get a good-looking, and decent pants-based suit, but ugly, impractical, nah, the modeling of dress maybe need the officials to pay more attention to it, it is not the dress problem, but the models.

[mered1th]

Originally posted by SotiCoto:

Did you forget what time period the game is allegedly set in?
On one hand it makes witches and wizards look super progressive. On the other hand, knowing they haven't changed AT ALL in the 200 years between this setting and HP is damning as hell.

Yeah, I totally get you. The team tried to make sure that the players wore sophisticated and beautiful clothes, and made a lot of options to blur the gender traits, but most of the modeling for women was still just dresses, which I'm sad about.

[StingingVelvet]

Not even absolutely sure what the OP is saying, but having only pants and long dresses would (to me) likely be due to you playing a kid and not wanting to sexualize them at all.

[boytype]

Originally posted by StingingVelvet:

Not even absolutely sure what the OP is saying, but having only pants and long dresses would (to me) likely be due to you playing a kid and not wanting to sexualize them at all.

The OP is saying, why do ALL characters not have access to ALL outfits?

If the Devs are so concerned with not mentioning or implementing gender whatsoever in their game, it is odd and sticks out a lot that "Body1" characters have access to all of the "male" clothes and none of the female ones and that "Body2" characters have access to all of the "female" outfits.

Why did they not just give access to ALL of the outfits to both body types, if they are trying to avoid implementing gender entirely in their game in every other way possible?

[SickTag]

My alt is wearing pants. She has the riding suit, and the adventurers outfit.

[Jesus Is King]

Originally posted by Mere712:

Apparently, all the female role users must have found out that most lookings for female roles basically are all long dress.
Well...not to be feminist or something, can officials mention this situation? Female long dress design is a little bit weird, why can't you just give all the players a chosen version of deciding dress in trousers or dress or something else?
Please optimize it, thanks a lot.

https://www.nexusmods.com/hogwartslegacy/mods/177

[mered1th]

Originally posted by boytype:

Originally posted by Empu0323:

If you want to play dress up get a barbie doll.

I actually included the expansive transmog system in the game as one of the positives in my review. I am absolutely fine with the system as it exists.

However, I would also rather that the game let you pick a gender and assigned a body type based on it, that it was called "Male Voice" and "Female Voice" instead of Voice1 and Voice2, and the bar tender didnt sound like a chain smoking bloke with throat cancer lol

What Im saying is they made so much effort to avoid including gender in the game in any form and then 100% dropped the ball by making all of the outfits locked to your gender choice.

hahahha what you said about bartender really makes me laugh, even I love this character but yeah...Her sound is really weird to listen to...
I absolutely agree with you.

[StingingVelvet]

Originally posted by boytype:

Why did they not just give access to ALL of the outfits to both body types, if they are trying to avoid implementing gender entirely in their game in every other way possible?

I'd guess because body type stuff is built into the outfits, like breasts, so wearing it on a male body would be odd? If you're trans then you're wanting to look like the opposite sex, yes? Not trying to wade into the politics of it, I'm literally just making my best guess.

Playing a girl I honestly thought a lot of the pants outfits were the same for guys, but I guess not.

[mered1th]

Originally posted by boytype:

Originally posted by StingingVelvet:

Not even absolutely sure what the OP is saying, but having only pants and long dresses would (to me) likely be due to you playing a kid and not wanting to sexualize them at all.

The OP is saying, why do ALL characters not have access to ALL outfits?

If the Devs are so concerned with not mentioning or implementing gender whatsoever in their game, it is odd and sticks out a lot that "Body1" characters have access to all of the "male" clothes and none of the female ones and that "Body2" characters have access to all of the "female" outfits.

Why did they not just give access to ALL of the outfits to both body types, if they are trying to avoid implementing gender entirely in their game in every other way possible?

Thank you for your answer. I'm not a native speaker of English, maybe some expressions will be odd, but your answer is what I'm trying to say.

[Harris]

Originally posted by GIGACHAD:

https://www.nexusmods.com/hogwartslegacy/mods/177

A similar mod for uniform skirts, a fix for HL-543, and we might as well finally have witches that are pleasant visually and aesthetically.

[Hikaru]

Had to run the entire prologue in a skirt and in feminine shoes T_T that was weird, I agree, considering that I could choose female or male voice and whether I’m a witch or a wizard. I always try to make my female characters more masculine presenting, so it’s the longest time I had a skirt or a dress on my character in any game, hope to get to the option of changing clothes and to find some pants soon…

[Wild_Ghost]

<Edited. I was being a bit of a d**k. Sorry>
You can acquire pants in the early game. I got them before even getting my wand.