Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
No.
//so much effort to remove the problematic elements from the source material//
Examples?
They believe the name Cho Chang is racist, because reasons. They believe the name Kingsley Shacklebolt is racist, because reasons. They believe goblins are based on Jews because they have long noses and like gold. They also believe that because house elves exist as servants to wizards, and that the wizarding community generally does not see a problem with this, that J.K Rowling herself actually supports slavery in the real world.
They completely ignore the fact that all of the villains are white, mostly men, and believe in a magic ideology that supports racism (if you consider magical humans and non-magical humans to be distinct races of humans) and eugenics.
To their mind J.K Rowling's books are strongly anti-racist but also secretly racist.
I wrote the last paragraph just for you friend. Ironic that you ask me to read hundreds of pages of books to comprehend something when you cant read one paragraph.
It doesnt matter to me that they "are" like this by "nature". He is scrubbing floors on his knees clothed in rags (like a slave) in a room that is magical and selfchanging, talks about himself in 3rd persons (like a servant/slave), speaks submissively and compliments me for doing the most mundane things.
I dont like that.
And you forgot to mention that the source material understands that those creatures are designed in a problematic manner too. What was that in Order of the Phoenix were the Blacks were cutting off their heads when they couldn't carry a tea tray? Seems like their also have been some kind of attempt to wage war on the "masters" eh?
So you might actually read those books you think you remember well again before you lecture me about something that i actually was not confused about because you couldnt even read a post properly.
The problem is easily mediated. Give me an option to gift him some clothes. Done.
The dog is not magically compelled to obey your every weird. You have to train into him. And giving him clothes wont change the nature of his relationship to you. You also INTERPRET your dogs behaviour as submissive. If youd understand a bit more about dogs you would know that it isnt. Unless you beat that into him.
You're not Deek's master, only the master can free a house elf.
Deek doesn't serve you, he serves Hogwarts.
The topic of house elf slavery has been around since the start, you're 25 years late on this topic. Let it rest, it's clearly not changing.
Oh that ♥♥♥♥.
Don't see them removing any of it from the game though, so still not sure why OP thinks they went to "so much effort".
Frankly, I am bored of games and other media setting a story in one period, but changing the culture and characters to make them comport with the cultural norms of the present.
I believe that if you are going to set a game in the Harry Potter universe then every reasonable step should be taken to remain faithful to the Harry Potter universe. If you keep changing and removing things to suit the whims of the current culture, before long you will have something that does not resemble the Harry Potter universe at all.