This should have been a multiplayer game

[Puppet Pal Clem]

Would have more replay value especially with pvp. Too bad.

[𝕃𝕀𝕃𝕐]

Multiplayer is for people who are extroverts or have friends

[aeternali]

Disagree, not every game has to be pvp.

[Puppet Pal Clem]

Originally posted by Lily:

Multiplayer is for people who are extroverts or have friends

No, it just looks like any other open world rpg, the attack animation is pretty repetitive too. Multiplayer would give this game something unique about it. Other than that imma pass.

[Gremmy]

Nah, it's nice to have some story focused single player games too.

[Hoshi82]

Not every game needs multiplayer. Personally I prefer a story driven singleplayer game where I can get lost in and not having constantly other players bunny hopping around you breaking immersion.

[Kenshiro]

Watching "Hairy Pooter" dash dancing, t-bagging, and trying to glitch himself in the wall while casting avada kedavra in nothing but his underwear and rainbow fro with a wizard hat on top d*cking about around Hogwarts while I'm trying to do a quest would f*ck with my immersion.
Despite that being kinda fun sometimes, I don't want it in my RPGs.

[Scytirix]

Originally posted by Kenshiro:

Watching "Hairy Pooter" dash dancing, t-bagging, and trying to glitch himself in the wall.....

That was entertaining, thanks for that, and yes...What you said.

Originally posted by MeaNGremmy:

Nah, it's nice to have some story focused single player games too.

I agree and it seems like story focused single player games are experiencing something of a resurgence.

Jedi Fallen Order
Hogwarts Legacy
Starfield
Jedi Survivor
Atomic Heart
Star Trek: Resurgence

I'm sure there's more, but those are the ones I can name off the top of my head.

[Flamm]

Well, I would pay for an modded third party multiplayer that allow custom content (especially retro-ingenered script). This would transform the game to a fabulous platform allowing particularely a roleplaying multiplayer mod; and please, don't tell that It wouldn't be awesome.

[Ensign]

The combat of the game is far too simple for pvp to work.

Its all lock on combat, players stuck during the casting animation, watch gameplay of it, you can see enemies surround the player and wait patiently on the sidelines as the player swirls thier want, getting a guy in mid-air, spamming him will spells while floating till ultimately blasting him with a stronger spell. In the span of 3-6 secs while enemies just stand by mugging at the player character for thier turn to be blasted.

This isnt a combat focused game its a exploration first, story second game.

[Miro Fox]

ew

[zenstrata]

I would view multiplayer as a bad thing for this game. I prefer the single player, story based experience.

[Demian DeVile]

I am happy it's not an Multiplayer game

[Kamikaze$X-GEN$]

I guess it would turn out to be a drama, thats why its only a solo game. Coop might be considered WB games never really had a pvp or real multiplayer game if my memory is correct.
But hey maybe in the future if this game is succesfull they might work on a true Harry Potter Universe MMORPG or something like that. Would be interesting I love playing MMORPGs. Although the only I play currently is still FF14 and only when new expansions and seasonal events happens.

[Cormoran]

if PVP has more replayability why do PVP games always die so quick?

[mcnichoj]

Originally posted by Lily:

Multiplayer is for people who are extroverts or have friends

I strictly play with randoms and no mics for ten hours a day.