Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
Regras e diretrizes para discussões
Denunciar esta mensagem
High system requirements make sense when you can see why they are high. This is a standard ue4 game that also runs on last gen machines and even switch. Just look at the gameplay and character models. You cannot with a straight face say this game looks better than rdr 2 for ex.
Here the requirements are high because they don't care about the pc port. Same thing happened with arkham knight. WB has a history with these things. It's clear they're constrained for time and they're willing to sacrifice the quality of the port to make up for it.
The red flags are all there, if you wanna ignore them that's on you. But I can guarantee you this game will get middling reviews and the performance on pc will be especially terrible.
You have a great attitude. But you really should think the opposite. If your positive about a game you want to like you will be twice as dissapointed when it comes out bad. If your critical of a game you like and its bad then its no surprise, if its good then its a pleasant surprise.
You should always be critical and skeptical. Be positive sure! But be realistic and dont just assume something is going to be an amazing experience, thats the attitude that has a higher chance of disappointment than someone who is realistic.
This is a legitimate gripe Lucifer has. Exploring the wizard world is fun, im getting immersed in the world, but it would suck to have to open up the shop and shell out for quest dlc so i dont "miss out" and can get the whole experience.
Selling us optional outfits is one thing, mounts? Sure. But stories? In a narrative/lore driven open world game?
His critique and other's critique of various points of the game should be something that opens your eyes and so you can see whats going on. Great that you just want a coffee and go to work with a positive attitude and dont wanna know about the latest mass shooting, but to say that those kinds of news stories are tiresome and ruins your day isnt the attitude to have. (not that you said any of that its just a similar example, which is dont ignore what you hear, dont take it too seriously but dont ignore it)
"I'm so tired of people getting riled up over these small details. I just want to be excited for this game."
Go ahead and be excited. Dont let people ruin your excitement but please dont get "tired" of critique, listen, read, learn to filter out the bad criticism like "lol bad game, 0/10". There is some pretty legitimate concerns you and fans should be aware of so we dont all overhype this with our excitement.
For all we know this isnt a game worth being excited about. Perhaps not ALL of hogwarts is rendered, MOST of it may be behind invisible walls and closed doors that never open. Perhaps its more linear and gated than we would like it to be. Perhaps its emptier that we imagined this lived in world to feel like.
But none of those concerns are the issue, most everyone is brining up stuff like excluded quests, expensive and lame collectors edition being a bad sign. Assassins creed does this all the time, they can afford to lock quests to exclusive deals because their quests are nothing special and their stories aren't that engaging or important, just something an intern wrote up in 20 minutes during a lunchbreak. Could this mean the stories in this game are just as shallow and forgettable? Is this story DLC just some forgettable missable throw away? Who knows.
Be skeptical, be aware. Be excited but be tempered in how you view criticism.
It won't be a unfinished game, alot of game developers do exclusives for their games to gain more sales, money.
Just PlayStation will have some quests that we won't have.
But it could also be because call of duty no longer does exclusives on PlayStation because of Microsoft so it just a ongoing war between two companies completing, if PlayStation didn't do it, Xbox would then this post would be about Xbox.
Every company just like every citizen needs money as it makes the world go around. PC is just caught in the cross fire as not a lot of developers do exclusives for PC as it's a dying breed. Not alot of PC gamers preorder anymore.
As mentioned earlier, it’s not just one quest. Liquid luck (the thing that makes everything you do successful,) is locked to PlayStation also.
Came here and removed it from my wishlist.
A tangible metric that can be tracked.
The problem with that? Thanks to people like you, who support/ignore this, we nowadays have microtransactions in single player games, games that are completely broken at launch because theres no pressure thanks to preorders, deluxe editions for prices that would have included something physical in previous times, and so on.
At some point you have to say "No, not one step further".
The console that charges you to save on the cloud, the console that Sony just raised the prices on everywhere outside the US, the console that arbitrarily raised the prices of all its games, the Japanese compay that moved to California and shut down its Japanese studio branch, the company that is on record saying they only want blockbuster titles, the company that charges developers if the games sell better on cross-platforms than they do on PlayStation, the company that cries foul when Microsoft purchases companies but promised that the game would still be on PlayStation (Call of Duty) and is the only company that does so, and the company that is currently being sued for ripping customers off by overcharging them......
Nah. I'm good not buying a console that is effectively designed to rip me off and try to tell me it's a privilege to be charged more when other gaming companies offer the same features for free (cloud saving) and better value for my money.
Being fiscally responsible is how people get out of being poor. Being loyal to a company that is actively ripping off its customer base is a good way to end up becoming poor rather than looking for better deals elsewhere.