I get creeped out by guys who have female chracters.

[Joseph Stassup]

C'mon, you where in PvE and when a female captain in your team talked, it was an old male in his late 40's-early 60's. You don't find it the least bit creepy? Even if he made largest bust size?

[Taris]

Oh come on, just treat people as fellow players not your real life friends. Only a pervert seeks the other sex a virtual world. Seriously.

[Skyforger]

8 pages of people backing the op up but not meaning to. "No I am not creepy, I only rolled the digital female character because I like to stare at her butt"<<<<<< nearly every single post in retort to the op.

That was the entirety of op's point, was that its creepy because the rolled it out of a sexual nature. So instead of * I just wanted to role play a female character* , you all replied *I like staring at digital female butts*.

[Family Share (akira)]

In every game I normally run a female character, 1 they have smaller hit boxes, 2. They are easier on the eyes. 3. I'm a guy why do I want to watch a guy run around all day.

And to the above poster.... :)

[AbsynthMinded]

The only thing dumber than starting a discussion over this, is responding to it instead of pointing out the sutpidity of asking.

[ZenMasterChip]

Цитата допису Melvin, the Lord of Darkness:

None of the things you said made any sort of sense. Especially that you think sexual preference is a factor at all. Also that you keep using the term "trolling" wrong.

Well, I guess I'll have to bow to your expertise. Please define it for me.

I qualify when sexual preference takes place. Your use of 'at all' is redundant, and is vaguely directed at my qualifiers. By my qualifying when this occurs, I set aside exceptions. "I think sexual preference is a factor" by exceptions to your statement "Sexual preference is not a factor". And how I feel about those exceptions, the operative word here being 'creeped out', are not right or wrong, they're just how I feel. And, any comment about that is merely an opinion, of which I may disagree but respect your right to express it just like the hole in your logic.

Rule: There are exceptions to every rule, except the rule of exceptions.

[ZenMasterChip]

Цитата допису AbsynthMinded:

The only thing dumber than starting a discussion over this, is responding to it instead of pointing out the sutpidity of asking.

Thanks, I can really appreciate a good conundrum. It takes real genius to admit your dumber, then redirect the stupidity A real magician's trick. The problem with it is that like all magic tricks it's an illusion. What you're really trying to say is 'Unask the question'. or 'Mu'. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mu_(negative)#.22Unasking.22_the_question


In other words: Because people disagree with you, the thread is still active. I personally find everyone's opinion interesting in that it covers a rainbow of spectrum.

[AbsynthMinded]

No, it's still active because people can't resist attempting to look clever. There is no discussion here anymore. The only progression is personal attacks.

[ZenMasterChip]

Цитата допису AbsynthMinded:

No, it's still active because people can't resist attempting to look clever. There is no discussion here anymore. The only progression is personal attacks.

I think that opinion depends upon original point of view. Again, you make a conundrum; I thought you very clever. BTW, I felt my original statement too vague and open to misunderstanding, I was editing my reply and added some supporting information while you were responding.

If you think that how one feels about something is a personal attack, perhaps you are an exception to the rule. What's wrong with a clever opinion? OTOH, I can admire your depth of understanding. Perhaps you understand what I'm saying, and disagree? I will admit, I felt your suggestion to 'not asking the question' was absurd. It offended my sense of reasoning. Perhaps if you know a way to 'unask the question' you would share it; because, I, thinking there was no way, thought your statement 'clever and rhetorical and showing a real sense of Mu. Was I wrong? Perhaps my mistake was in embuing you with a trait you don't possess? Please explain what problem you have with what I've said. If I took everything back I've said about you; and admit I was wrong; would that be correct. Should I "unmake the statement"? Or perhaps I only misunderstood that you meant Mu. You were trying to say that the dumbest thing is asking the question.

Just to clarify what I think: I don't think there are any dumb questions; just rhetorical ones, and dumb answers (for clarity that does also imply there are smart answers; but I was talking about questions). Is that clear enough? If you're saying the original question was rhetorical, well, other than the exceptions, I agree. Other than that... Mu! And suddenly the thread completely vanished.

[Zeropoint101]

I like to call this sort of thing "nerd wrastlin"

[Oberon]

Цитата допису Cyberpapa:

Цитата допису Melvin, the Lord of Darkness:

None of the things you said made any sort of sense. Especially that you think sexual preference is a factor at all. Also that you keep using the term "trolling" wrong.

Well, I guess I'll have to bow to your expertise. Please define it for me.

I qualify when sexual preference takes place. Your use of 'at all' is redundant, and is vaguely directed at my qualifiers. By my qualifying when this occurs, I set aside exceptions. "I think sexual preference is a factor" by exceptions to your statement "Sexual preference is not a factor". And how I feel about those exceptions, the operative word here being 'creeped out', are not right or wrong, they're just how I feel. And, any comment about that is merely an opinion, of which I may disagree but respect your right to express it just like the hole in your logic.

Rule: There are exceptions to every rule, except the rule of exceptions.

I'm just going to take a shot in the dark here: English isn't your first language, is it?

[Zeropoint101]

Цитата допису Melvin, the Lord of Darkness:

Цитата допису Cyberpapa:

Well, I guess I'll have to bow to your expertise. Please define it for me.

I qualify when sexual preference takes place. Your use of 'at all' is redundant, and is vaguely directed at my qualifiers. By my qualifying when this occurs, I set aside exceptions. "I think sexual preference is a factor" by exceptions to your statement "Sexual preference is not a factor". And how I feel about those exceptions, the operative word here being 'creeped out', are not right or wrong, they're just how I feel. And, any comment about that is merely an opinion, of which I may disagree but respect your right to express it just like the hole in your logic.

Rule: There are exceptions to every rule, except the rule of exceptions.

I'm just going to take a shot in the dark here: English isn't your first language, is it?

I think it's more a case of someone trying to sound smarter than they actually are. Cyberpapa, if you're going to show off you're vocabulary, use the words right and have the grammar and punctuation skills to go with it please..

Like I said.. nerd wrastlin'

[pleasenoname3]

Its ridiculous,i can tell which female characters are men, by the breast size on the character. It needs to end, its just stupid. Everyone needs to be themselves.

[Zeropoint101]

Цитата допису pleasenoname3:

Its ridiculous,i can tell which female characters are men, by the breast size on the character. It needs to end, its just stupid. Everyone needs to be themselves.

Doesn't "being yourself" kind of make the whole point of "role playing" games moot?

[Oberon]

Цитата допису pleasenoname3:

Its ridiculous,i can tell which female characters are men, by the breast size on the character. It needs to end, its just stupid. Everyone needs to be themselves.

If I wanted to be myself, I'd go outside. This is a video game, and I can be whatever the hell I want. Male, female, human, klingon, anything. And if you don't like it, tough ♥♥♥♥.

[AbsynthMinded]

Such sentiments couldn't have possibly been uttered already in the past 15 pages, could they?