Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
So if I remember right, High Yield has a 100% to proc a secondary effect. On torpedo spread, every torpedo in the spread as a 33% chance of procing a secondary effect.
But it's not addition, it's 33% chance for each torpedo. The law of probability is that on a 3 torpedo spread at 33%, you still have a god chance to proc the secondary effect, but it's not guarenteed like High Yield is.
Thing is, with the exception of plasma and certain other specific torps, High Yield also spits out multiple torpedoes, just at a single target and for reduced damage per torp. Spread fires multiple without reduced damage and does so at one or more targets. It's not really a contest at all.
It's multiples, yeah, but it's like... what 5 on HY3? 5 is a lot more reasonable that 30. To me. :shrug: I've never liked the way Spread looks in the game. It should be 3-5 torps shot at and detonating in an area around the primary target dealing damage to enemies in that area.
HY3 is 4 torpedoes, each dealing between 55% and 74% normal damage depending on type. Spread3 is 4 torpedoes per target at up to 5 targets, at full normal damage... which is why spread is still better even against a single target. Spread isn't AOE unless the torpedoes themselves are AOE, it just potentially targets more than one enemy.
Of course, if you care more about how it looks than how it functions the details don't much matter - you go with what you like. In most content you could throw confetti at the enemies and still come away victorious.
I can't speak to every torpedo in the game, but my quantum phases shoot 4 pairs of torpedoes at each target. So a maximum of 40. It looks terrible, but it's obnoxiously effective, given the AoE nature of the game.
I didn't say it was. I said it should've been.
That's just visual. The actual effect is 2, 3 or 4 torpedoes per target to 3, 4 or 5 targets, depending on the rank of the spread.
So exactly what I've been talking about for the past 3 posts? Welcome to the conversation, so glad you could join us.
I'm sorry if you have a problem with clarity and relevance. I'm not sure you need to say, out loud, that you prefer how something looks in a discussion of which of two abilities is better. What your visual preferences are is unlikely to influence someone else's choices.
you yourself said it best
spread is numerically better in 99% of use-cases, albeit within an acceptable margin of error
as there is no economic difference between the two firing modes it therefore tracks that aesthetic concerns are next in line
if it weren't, there wouldn't even be a "space barbie" movement
given your track record of moving goalposts and wilfully misinterpreting your opponent's arguments to suit your own biases, this rings especially hollow coming from you