Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I believe the reason is that what amounts to painting a portrait of any quality, style and realism takes a long time and therefore extremely expensive. There's no short cut to creating portraits of the quality we see in this game for the main characters. How much does the average reasonably successful artist charge for doing someone's portrait?
Art is difficult and it ain't cheap.
One game that does have a *lot* of them is the Civ like 4X game called Old World. Old Worlds portraits are stunningly beautiful. Guess what? They were done by the wife of the guy who owns the studio that made the game.
No doubt there are ways to auto-generate character portraits but my guess theey would be easily identifiable as such and not have the same visual impact and individuality. So it's a trade off between really high quality art for the main characters or crap for every character.
Wow what a hot take.
Personally, I'd rather the portrait painters weren't handling programming duties myself.